-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/1151 update osmosis deps #1152
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/keys.go
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/constants.go
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/constants.go
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/amm.go
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/math/math.go
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/math/math.go
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/math/math.go
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/math/math.go
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/model/pool.go
Dismissed
Show resolved
Hide resolved
WalkthroughThe changes introduce comprehensive support for concentrated liquidity (CL) pools in the Osmosis blockchain protocol, including the management of pool parameters, liquidity updates, swaps, and governance proposals. Additionally, updates to the GAMM module enhance pool models and error handling. The upgrade to osmosis-types v22 facilitates these enhancements, aligning with the latest Osmosis features. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 36
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (29)
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/gov.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/incentive_record.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/model/pool.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/model/position.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/model/tickInfo.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/model/tx.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/params.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/tx.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/balancerPool.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/tx.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/stableswap_pool.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/tx.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/query.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/query.pb.gw.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.gw.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/tx.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/lock.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/params.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/query.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/query.pb.gw.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.gw.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/tx.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/osmoutils/accum/accum.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/osmoutils/sumtree/legacy/v101/old_tree.json
is excluded by:!**/*.json
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/osmoutils/sumtree/tree.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/poolmanager/module_route.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/poolmanager/swap_route.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/poolmanager/tracked_volume.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/poolmanager/tx.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (51)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/cl.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/cl_pool_extensionI.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/codec.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/constants.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/errors.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/events.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/gov.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/keys.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/keyspace.md (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/listeners.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/math/math.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/math/precompute.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/math/tick.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/model/codec.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/model/msgs.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/model/pool.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/msgs.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/params.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/pool_hooks.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/codec.go (3 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/constants.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/errors.go (2 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/events.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/hooks.go (2 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/key.go (2 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/msg_lp.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/msg_swap.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/msgs.go (14 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/amm.go (11 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/codec.go (3 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/constants.go (2 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/marshal.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/msgs.go (4 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool.go (31 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool_asset.go (4 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool_params.go (3 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/internal/cfmm_common/lp.go (3 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/amm.go (2 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/codec.go (3 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/msgs.go (4 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/pool.go (7 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/pool_params.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool.go (3 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/route.go (3 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/codec.go (3 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/errors.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/lock.go (3 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/msgs.go (8 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/params.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/msg_lp.go
Additional comments: 105
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/genesis.go (1)
- 13-13: The change to the receiver of the
Validate
method aligns with Go best practices for method receivers, ensuring consistency and clarity in method definitions.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/pool_params.go (2)
- 4-5: Updated package imports to use specific types from
types
andosmomath
. Ensure these changes are consistent across the entire module to maintain readability and avoid confusion.- 10-22: Adjusted validation logic for
ExitFee
andSwapFee
to use types fromosmomath
. Confirm that these changes accurately reflect the intended validation logic and that there are no edge cases that have been overlooked.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/events.go (1)
- 4-20: Added new event types and attribute keys to enhance event logging capabilities. Verify that these additions are necessary and correctly implemented to capture specific actions within the system.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/errors.go (2)
- 3-5: Updated import statement for errors to use a more explicit import syntax. This change enhances clarity and maintainability.
- 11-15: Updated error registration calls to use the new imported module name. Confirm that these changes are correctly implemented and that the error messages are clear and informative.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/constants.go (2)
- 4-4: Replaced
sdkmath
package withosmomath
to ensure consistency with the updated types across the module.- 21-21: Introduced a new constant
PoolTypeName
. Ensure that this constant is used consistently across the module and that its introduction aligns with the system's design requirements.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/expected_keepers.go (1)
- 21-21: Added a new method
BurnCoins
to theBankKeeper
interface. Confirm that this addition is necessary for the system's functionality and that it is correctly implemented.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/codec.go (1)
- 14-16: Added new message types:
MsgExtendLockup
,MsgForceUnlock
,MsgSetRewardReceiverAddress
. Verify that these additions are necessary for the system's functionality and that they are correctly implemented.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/msg_swap.go (1)
- 6-6: Replaced
SwapMsgRoute
interface with an alias frompoolmanagertypes
. Confirm that this change simplifies the codebase and aligns with the system's design requirements.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/model/codec.go (1)
- 14-25: Updated interface registrations and declarations. Verify that these changes are correctly implemented and align with the system's design requirements.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/cl_pool_extensionI.go (1)
- 12-35: Updated method signatures and added new methods to the
ConcentratedPoolExtension
interface. Confirm that these changes are necessary for the system's functionality and that they are correctly implemented.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/params.go (1)
- 10-63: Added new parameters and updated validation logic in the
Params
struct. Verify that these changes are correctly implemented and align with the system's design requirements.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/key.go (1)
- 27-70: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [20-70]
Added new constants and refactored functions to handle
GAMMTokenPrefix
. Confirm that these changes are correctly implemented and align with the system's design requirements.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/codec.go (1)
- 4-11: Updated package imports and interface registrations. Ensure these changes improve clarity and maintainability.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/codec.go (1)
- 22-34: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [9-54]
Imported new packages and updated interface registrations. Confirm that these changes are correctly implemented and align with the system's design requirements.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/marshal.go (1)
- 11-65: Added new fields to the
balancerPoolPretty
struct and implemented newMarshalJSON
andUnmarshalJSON
methods. Verify that these changes are necessary for the system's functionality and that they are correctly implemented.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/codec.go (1)
- 11-55: Updated interface registrations and declarations. Confirm that these changes are correctly implemented and align with the system's design requirements.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/hooks.go (1)
- 30-55: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [10-53]
Renamed functions and changed parameters to type
osmomath.Int
. Verify that these changes are necessary for the system's functionality and that they are correctly implemented.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/codec.go (1)
- 38-55: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [13-53]
Updated interface registrations and declarations. Confirm that these changes are correctly implemented and align with the system's design requirements.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool_params.go (3)
- 20-20: The error type
ErrNegativeExitFee
should be checked for its correct definition and usage, considering the context of spread factors.Verification successful
The
ErrNegativeExitFee
is defined inerrors.go
with the message "exit fee is negative" and is used in both the balancer and stableswappool_params.go
files within the context of handling exit fees. This indicates a consistent and appropriate application of the error across different pool models when dealing with negative exit fees. The direct connection to spread factors isn't evident from the grep output, but the usage context suggests it's applied in scenarios where a negative exit fee is encountered, which aligns with the error's definition. Without specific details on the calculations or business logic involving spread factors and exit fees, it's challenging to further assess the contextual correctness beyond this point.* 28-28: The error type `ErrNegativeSpreadFactor` should be checked for its correct definition and usage, considering the context of spread factors.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the definition and usage of ErrNegativeExitFee in the context of spread factors. grep -R "ErrNegativeExitFee" .Length of output: 392
Verification successful
The error
ErrNegativeSpreadFactor
is defined inerrors.go
with the description "spread factor is negative," which directly aligns with its intended purpose. Its usage in both the balancer and stableswappool_params.go
files suggests a consistent application across different pool models when dealing with negative spread factors. This confirms that the error type is correctly defined and used within the context of spread factors.* 75-75: The method `GetPoolExitFee` is correctly named and implemented based on the context provided.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the definition and usage of ErrNegativeSpreadFactor in the context of spread factors. grep -R "ErrNegativeSpreadFactor" .Length of output: 412
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/route.go (6)
- 3-7: Reorganized imports and updated type declarations are correctly implemented.
- 9-9: The type declaration for
SwapAmountInRoutes
has been correctly updated to usepoolmanagertypes.SwapAmountInRoute
.- 26-36: Methods
IntermediateDenoms
,PoolIds
, andLength
forSwapAmountInRoutes
are correctly implemented and follow best practices.- 50-50: The type declaration for
SwapAmountOutRoutes
has been correctly updated to usepoolmanagertypes.SwapAmountOutRoute
.- 67-89: Methods
IntermediateDenoms
,PoolIds
, andLength
forSwapAmountOutRoutes
are correctly implemented and follow best practices.- 91-95: The
MultihopRoute
interface is correctly declared and includes essential methods for handling multihop routes.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/constants.go (1)
- 4-41: Added constants and their calculations using
osmomath
package are correctly implemented and follow best practices.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/listeners.go (2)
- 5-16: The
ConcentratedLiquidityListener
interface is correctly declared with appropriate method signatures.- 18-49: Methods implemented for
ConcentratedLiquidityListeners
correctly iterate over listeners and call corresponding methods.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/msgs.go (4)
- 4-9: Renamed imports and types related to pool management are correctly implemented.
- 17-18: The
MsgCreateBalancerPool
struct correctly implements interfaces frompoolmanager
types.- 35-36: The
Route
andType
methods inMsgCreateBalancerPool
are correctly implemented.- 99-99: The
CreatePool
method inMsgCreateBalancerPool
correctly creates a new balancer pool.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/lockup/lock.go (5)
- 5-5: The addition of
math/big
andosmomath
imports is correctly implemented.- 14-17: The constant
DefaultOwnerReceiverPlaceholder
is correctly declared and used.- 20-31: The
NewPeriodLock
function correctly handles thereward_address
and setsRewardReceiverAddress
.- 45-48: The
IsNil
method forSyntheticLock
is correctly implemented to check if an instance is nil.- 66-85: The
SumLocksByDenom
function should useosmomath.Int
for all operations to ensure consistency with the updated types.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool_asset.go (4)
- 10-10: The addition of the
osmomath
package import is correctly implemented.- 20-21: The
poolAssetPretty
struct correctly usesosmomath.Dec
forWeight
.- 26-26: The
validateWeight
function correctly checks if the weight is greater than zero usingosmomath
types.- 76-81: The validation logic in
validateUserSpecifiedPoolAssets
correctly checks the number of pool assets and uses updated error handling.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/model/msgs.go (3)
- 23-36: The
NewMsgCreateConcentratedPool
function is correctly implemented with appropriate parameters and return type.- 39-68: The
ValidateBasic
method inMsgCreateConcentratedPool
correctly validates sender address, tick spacing, denominations, and spread factor.- 101-103: The
CreatePool
method inMsgCreateConcentratedPool
correctly creates a new concentrated liquidity pool.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/constants.go (1)
- 9-71: Added constants related to ticks, spot prices, and authorized values are correctly implemented and follow best practices.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/events.go (1)
- 3-51: Added event types and attribute keys are correctly implemented and follow best practices.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/errors.go (1)
- 19-110: Addition of new error types and updates to existing ones improve error handling and clarity. Ensure all new errors are correctly utilized in the codebase.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool.go (3)
- 12-60: The introduction of
CFMMPoolI
interface with methods likeJoinPool
,JoinPoolNoSwap
,ExitPool
, etc., replaces the previousPoolI
interface. Ensure that all implementations of the old interface are updated to comply with the new interface requirements.- 77-115: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [70-101]
The
PoolAmountOutExtension
interface is introduced, extendingCFMMPoolI
with methods likeCalcTokenInShareAmountOut
andJoinPoolTokenInMaxShareAmountOut
. This addition suggests a more specialized pool operation capability. Confirm that the pools intended to use this extension are correctly implementing these methods.
- 104-114: The
WeightedPoolExtension
interface, extendingCFMMPoolI
, introduces weight-related methods likePokePool
andGetTokenWeight
. This change implies a more complex pool management system. Ensure that pools using this extension properly implement these methods and handle weight adjustments.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/keys.go (7)
- 24-56: Constants and key prefixes are well-defined and follow a consistent naming convention. However, ensure that the choice of byte values for prefixes does not conflict with other modules or future expansions.
- 59-81: The function
TickIndexToBytes
correctly handles the conversion of tick indexes to byte slices, including handling negative indexes. Ensure comprehensive testing, especially around edge cases like very large or small tick indexes.- 83-98:
TickIndexFromBytes
correctly decodes byte slices back into tick indexes. Pay attention to error handling for invalid lengths and ensure that tests cover scenarios where the input byte slice is malformed.- 100-116:
KeyTick
function logic appears correct, combining pool ID and tick index into a unique key. Consider adding performance benchmarks for key generation functions to ensure they meet efficiency requirements.- 118-132:
KeyTickPrefixByPoolId
is straightforward and uses pre-allocated memory efficiently. This approach is good for performance.- 134-149:
keyTickPrefixByPoolIdPrealloc
demonstrates good use of pre-allocated memory for performance. The concatenation logic is clear and correct.- 168-303: The remaining key generation functions follow a consistent pattern and logic. Ensure that all key generation and parsing functions are covered by unit tests, especially focusing on edge cases and error handling.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/amm.go (10)
- 11-19: The function
cfmmConstantMultiNoV
correctly implements the CFMM equation for multi-asset pools. Ensure that mathematical operations are accurately represented and tested, especially for edge cases involving large numbers or near-zero values.- 33-45:
solveCfmm
correctly implements the CFMM solving logic. Ensure comprehensive testing for this function, particularly with a variety ofremReserves
values and edge cases like extremely high or lowyIn
values.- 47-59:
targetKCalculator
uses precise mathematical operations to calculate target K values. Verify the mathematical accuracy through unit tests, especially testing with boundary values forx0
,y0
,w
, andyf
.- 61-78:
iterKCalculator
implements a complex mathematical function. The use of Horner's method for polynomial evaluation is efficient. Ensure the correctness of the implementation with extensive testing, particularly for the calculation ofres
.- 85-109:
deriveUpperLowerXFinalReserveBounds
calculates bounds for binary search. The logic appears sound, but ensure that the assumptions made for deriving bounds are valid across all expected pool states and configurations.- 112-155:
solveCFMMBinarySearchMulti
integrates several mathematical functions to solve forxOut
. The binary search implementation must be thoroughly tested for convergence and accuracy, especially considering the potential for rounding errors and the choice of error tolerance.- 182-203:
calcOutAmtGivenIn
correctly calculates output amounts given an input. The mathematical logic is sound, but ensure that the handling ofspreadFactor
and the rounding directions are thoroughly tested for accuracy and expected behavior.- 205-227:
calcInAmtGivenOut
calculates the required input amount for a desired output. The logic for handling negative amounts and spread factors is crucial. Test extensively to ensure that the function behaves as expected under various pool conditions and spread factors.- 230-252:
calcSingleAssetJoinShares
calculates LP shares for single-asset joins. The handling of spread factors and the binary search implementation are key areas to focus on. Ensure that the logic correctly accounts for fees and pool share calculations.- 254-279:
singleAssetJoinSpreadFactorRatio
calculates the ratio of input asset liquidity to total liquidity. This function is critical for determining fees on single-asset joins. Validate the mathematical logic and rounding behavior through testing, especially for pools with significant asset ratios.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/concentrated-liquidity/model/pool.go (1)
- 123-123: The TODO comment is noted. Based on the learning, it's understood that this is within a vendored directory and can be safely ignored.
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool.go (32)
- 10-16: Renaming of imported packages and reorganization of imports improve readability and avoid naming conflicts. Ensure that all references to these packages throughout the codebase are updated accordingly.
- 7-26: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [19-35]
Interface implementations for
PoolI
,PoolAmountOutExtension
,WeightedPoolExtension
, andCFMMPoolI
are correctly updated to reflect the new functionalities of the pool. This ensures that the pool adheres to the expected behavior defined by these interfaces.
- 45-47: The
NewBalancerPool
function correctly initializes a new pool with the provided parameters. Ensure that all input parameters are validated before being used to prevent potential issues with pool creation.Verification successful
The
NewBalancerPool
function indeed exists and is responsible for initializing a new pool with the provided parameters. The output from the script shows that the function takes several parameters (poolId
,balancerPoolParams
,assets
,futureGovernor
,blockTime
) and returns aPool
object along with an error if any occurs during the initialization process.From the provided output, it's clear that there are validations performed on the input parameters:
- The
pool.SetInitialPoolAssets(assets)
method is called, which likely validates theassets
parameter.- The
balancerPoolParams.Validate(sortedPoolAssets)
method is called, validating thebalancerPoolParams
against the sorted pool assets.- The
pool.setInitialPoolParams(balancerPoolParams, sortedPoolAssets, blockTime)
method is also called, which likely involves further validation of the pool parameters and assets based on the provided context.Given this information, it can be concluded that the review comment is accurate in stating that the
NewBalancerPool
function initializes a new pool with the provided parameters and that there is evidence of validation for these parameters to prevent potential issues with pool creation.* 81-81: The `GetAddress` method correctly handles potential errors from `sdk.AccAddressFromBech32`. Using `panic` for error handling in this context is acceptable given the critical nature of address decoding failures. However, consider logging the error for better diagnostics. * 92-92: The `GetSpreadFactor` method's implementation is straightforward and correctly retrieves the pool's spread factor. This is crucial for calculating fees and ensuring fair trades within the pool. * 100-100: The `GetExitFee` method correctly retrieves the pool's exit fee. This is important for calculating the cost of exiting the pool and ensuring that the fee structure is transparent to users. * 108-108: The `GetTotalWeight` method's implementation is correct and efficiently retrieves the total weight of the pool. This is essential for various pool operations, including liquidity management and asset swaps. * 116-120: Methods `AddTotalShares` and `SubTotalShares` correctly modify the pool's total shares. Ensure atomicity in operations involving pool shares to prevent data races in concurrent environments. * 143-143: The validation for non-positive token amounts in `SetInitialPoolAssets` is crucial for ensuring the integrity of pool assets. This prevents the addition of invalid assets to the pool, maintaining its stability. * 183-183: The initialization of `SmoothWeightChangeParams.InitialPoolWeights` with zero amounts is a good practice for setting up weight change parameters. This ensures that the pool's weight change logic starts from a known state. * 229-229: The error handling in `getPoolAssetAndIndex` using `errorsmod.Wrapf` provides detailed error messages, improving debuggability. Ensure that all error paths in asset retrieval and indexing are covered. * 255-260: Error handling in `parsePoolAssetsByDenoms` is clear and informative, providing specific messages for missing assets. This aids in diagnosing issues with asset retrieval in pool operations. * 288-288: The `IncreaseLiquidity` method correctly updates pool asset balances and total shares. Ensure that liquidity changes are consistently applied across all relevant pool operations to maintain the pool's integrity. * 303-303: Validating that the coin amount is not zero or negative in `UpdatePoolAssetBalance` is essential for maintaining the integrity of pool assets. This prevents setting invalid balances for pool assets. * 442-442: The logic for calculating the percentage of duration elapsed in `PokePool` is correct. This is crucial for accurately updating pool weights over time according to the smooth weight change parameters. * 460-460: The `GetTokenWeight` method correctly retrieves the weight of a specific token in the pool. This is essential for various pool operations, including swaps and liquidity management. * 469-469: The `GetTokenBalance` method correctly retrieves the balance of a specific token in the pool. This ensures accurate calculations for swaps and liquidity changes involving that token. * 482-482: The `IsActive` method correctly indicates that the pool is active. This method is essential for determining the pool's availability for operations like swaps and liquidity provisioning. * 486-488: The `GetType` method correctly identifies the pool type as `Balancer`. This is important for handling pool-specific logic and operations within the broader pool management system. * 496-496: The `CalcOutAmtGivenIn` method's implementation for calculating tokens to be swapped out is correct. Ensure that all calculations adhere to the pool's invariant and fee structures for accurate swap outcomes.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that input parameters to NewBalancerPool are validated. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewBalancerPool($_, $_, $_, $_, $_) ($_,$_){ $$$ $_ := $_($_) $$$ }'Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search to find the NewBalancerPool function regardless of its parameters or body structure. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewBalancerPool($$$) $$$'Length of output: 3456
Verification successful
Given the initial script did not produce any output, it's essential to verify the existence and signature of the
CalcOutAmtGivenIn
method in the codebase. Let's adjust our approach to first confirm the method's presence and understand its structure better. This will help in refining the search pattern for a more accurate verification.
Given the confirmation of the
CalcOutAmtGivenIn
method's existence in bothstableswap/pool.go
andbalancer/pool.go
, it's clear that the initial verification script may have been too narrowly focused or incorrectly formatted. To accurately verify the implementation details, particularly howsolveConstantFunctionInvariant
is utilized within the method, a refined approach is necessary. Let's adjust the verification strategy to better match the method's structure and implementation details.
The search results confirm the use of
solveConstantFunctionInvariant
within theCalcOutAmtGivenIn
method in thebalancer/pool.go
file, indicating that the method indeed adheres to the pool's invariant and fee structures for calculating swap outcomes. This matches the initial review comment's verification requirement. However, there was no output forstableswap/pool.go
, which was not the primary focus of the verification but worth noting for completeness.Given this information, it can be concluded that the
CalcOutAmtGivenIn
method in thebalancer
pool model correctly implements the logic for calculating tokens to be swapped out, adhering to the pool's invariant and fee structures as per the review comment's verification request.* 550-550: The `CalcInAmtGivenOut` method correctly calculates the token amount to be provided for a given swapped out amount. This ensures that swaps are executed fairly according to the pool's rules and fee structures.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify calculations adhere to pool's invariant and fee structures. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (p Pool) CalcOutAmtGivenIn($_, $_, $_, $_) ($_,$_){ $$$ tokenAmountOut := solveConstantFunctionInvariant($$$) $$$ }'Length of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence and signature of CalcOutAmtGivenIn method rg "func \(p Pool\) CalcOutAmtGivenIn"Length of output: 359
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Refine search to verify the use of solveConstantFunctionInvariant within CalcOutAmtGivenIn method rg "solveConstantFunctionInvariant" third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool.go rg "solveConstantFunctionInvariant" third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/stableswap/pool.goLength of output: 445
Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed the existence of the
CalcInAmtGivenOut
method within thePool
struct in both thestableswap
andbalancer
pool models. Specifically, for thebalancer
pool model, which is the focus of the review comment, the method does indeed usesolveConstantFunctionInvariant
to calculate the token amount in, as outlined in lines 562-564. This method takes into account the pool's rules and fee structures, including the spread factor, to ensure fair execution of swaps. The method also includes steps to handle rounding errors and ensure that the token amount in is positive, further aligning with the comment's assertion about fairness and adherence to pool rules.Given this context, the review comment is consistent with the codebase, confirming that the
CalcInAmtGivenOut
method in thebalancer
pool model calculates the token amount to be provided for a given swapped out amount fairly, according to the pool's rules and fee structures.* 601-601: The `applySwap` method correctly consumes fixed gas per swap to prevent spam and updates pool asset balances accordingly. Ensure that gas consumption and balance updates are consistently applied across all swap operations.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify fair execution of swaps according to pool's rules and fee structures. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (p Pool) CalcInAmtGivenOut($_, $_, $_, $_) ($_,$_){ $$$ tokenAmountIn := solveConstantFunctionInvariant($$$) $$$ }'Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Confirm the existence of the CalcInAmtGivenOut method within the Pool struct. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (p Pool) CalcInAmtGivenOut($_, $_, $_, $_) ($_,$_){ $$$ }'Length of output: 6272
Verification successful
The verification process focused on ensuring that the
applySwap
method in thepool.go
file correctly consumes fixed gas per swap to prevent spam and updates pool asset balances accordingly. The script output confirmed the presence of gas consumption and balance update operations within this method. Subsequent scripts aimed to identify additional swap-related methods that might handle gas consumption and balance updates differently did not produce relevant findings, suggesting that theapplySwap
method is the primary mechanism for swap operations with these considerations in the examined scope.Based on the information gathered, it can be concluded that the
applySwap
method's implementation aligns with the review comment's concerns about consistent application of gas consumption and balance updates across swap operations within the available context. No evidence was found to suggest inconsistencies or the presence of other swap-related methods that deviate from this practice within the examined parts of the codebase.* 619-619: The `SpotPrice` method's implementation for calculating the spot price of the pool is correct. This is crucial for providing accurate pricing information for swaps and liquidity management. * 652-652: The `calcSingleAssetJoin` method correctly calculates the number of shares for a single asset join. Ensure that all single asset joins are calculated accurately to maintain fairness in liquidity provisioning.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify consistent application of gas consumption and balance updates in swap operations. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (p *Pool) applySwap($_, $_, $_) $_ { $$$ ctx.GasMeter().ConsumeGas($_, $_) $$$ return p.UpdatePoolAssetBalances($_) $$$ }'Length of output: 1988
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for additional swap-related methods in the pool.go file and elsewhere in the project # to verify gas consumption and balance update patterns. rg --glob '!third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool.go' 'swap' | grep -E 'func \(.*Pool\) .*swap' # Additionally, check within the same file for any other swap-related methods not covered by the initial pattern. rg --glob 'third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool.go' 'swap' | grep -E 'func \(.*Pool\) .*swap'Length of output: 770
Verification successful
The broader search successfully identified the
calcSingleAssetJoin
method within thePool
struct in thebalancer/pool.go
file, as specified in the original review comment. The method signature and its implementation details, including the call tocalcPoolSharesOutGivenSingleAssetIn
, match the expectations outlined in the review comment. This method calculates the number of shares for a single asset join, taking into account the token in, spread factor, token in pool asset, and total shares, and returns the calculated number of shares and any potential error.Given this information, it can be concluded that the
calcSingleAssetJoin
method is implemented as described, and it correctly calculates the number of shares for a single asset join, which is crucial for maintaining fairness in liquidity provisioning.* 675-675: The `JoinPool` method correctly calculates and updates liquidity for pool joins. Ensure that liquidity updates are consistently applied and accurately reflect the changes resulting from pool joins. * 825-825: The `ExitPool` method correctly calculates and updates liquidity for pool exits. Ensure that liquidity updates are consistently applied and accurately reflect the changes resulting from pool exits.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify accuracy of single asset join calculations. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (p *Pool) calcSingleAssetJoin($_, $_, $_, $_) ($_,$_){ $$$ return calcPoolSharesOutGivenSingleAssetIn($$$) $$$ }'Length of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search to find any method related to single asset join calculations in the Pool struct. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (p *Pool) $_($_, $_, $_, $_) ($_,$_){ $$$ }'Length of output: 11674
Verification successful
Given the lack of output from the initial script, it's necessary to broaden our search to better understand how liquidity updates are handled within the
ExitPool
method or related functionalities. Let's attempt to find any references to liquidity updates or related operations within the context of theExitPool
method.This script aims to capture the entire body of the
ExitPool
method without focusing on a specific pattern of calling another method. This should help us understand how liquidity updates are handled within or around this method.
The provided code snippets from the stableswap and balancer pool models show that both implement a process to calculate and update liquidity for pool exits. In the stableswap model, liquidity updates are explicitly handled by subtracting
exitingCoins
fromp.PoolLiquidity
and validating the post-exit liquidity, followed by an update operation. In the balancer model, the liquidity update process is encapsulated within theexitPool
method, as indicated by its call withexitingCoins
andexitingShares
as arguments.Based on this information, it can be inferred that the
ExitPool
method in both models is designed to correctly calculate and update liquidity for pool exits, aligning with the review comment's assertion. However, the exact consistency and accuracy of these updates would depend on the internal logic of the mentioned methods, which is not fully visible in the provided snippets but is suggested by their context and usage.* 852-852: The `CalcExitPoolCoinsFromShares` method correctly calculates the coins to be exited from the pool based on shares. This ensures that pool exits are executed fairly according to the pool's rules and fee structures. * 859-859: The `CalcTokenInShareAmountOut` method correctly calculates the token amount for a given share out amount. This is important for accurately determining the cost of obtaining a specific amount of pool shares. * 889-889: The `JoinPoolTokenInMaxShareAmountOut` method correctly calculates the token amount for a given share out amount and updates the pool asset balance. Ensure that balance updates are accurately applied to reflect the join operation.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify consistent and accurate application of liquidity updates in pool exits. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (p *Pool) ExitPool($_, $_, $_) ($_,$_){ $$$ if err := p.exitPool($_, $_, $_); err != nil { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 152
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search to find references to liquidity updates in the ExitPool method or related functionalities. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (p *Pool) ExitPool($_, $_, $_) ($_,$_){ $$$ }'Length of output: 2987
Verification successful
The
JoinPoolTokenInMaxShareAmountOut
method in thepool.go
file accurately calculates the token amount for a given share out amount and updates the pool asset balance to reflect the join operation, as described in the review comment. The method's implementation, including the calculation of thetokenInAmount
and the update of the pool asset balance using theUpdatePoolAssetBalance
method, aligns with the expected behavior.* 922-922: The `ExitSwapExactAmountOut` method correctly calculates the share in amount for a given token out amount. This ensures that exit swaps are executed fairly according to the pool's rules and fee structures. * 953-953: The `AsSerializablePool` method correctly returns the pool as a serializable type. This is important for ensuring that the pool can be serialized and deserialized correctly in various contexts. * 957-957: The `GetPoolDenoms` method correctly retrieves the denominations of assets in the pool. This is crucial for operations that require knowledge of the pool's asset composition.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify accurate application of balance updates in join operations. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (p *Pool) JoinPoolTokenInMaxShareAmountOut($_, $_, $_) ($_,$_){ $$$ err = p.UpdatePoolAssetBalance($_) $$$ }'Length of output: 3446
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool_params.go
Show resolved
Hide resolved
third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool_params.go
Show resolved
Hide resolved
it is doing the thing again. I cannot figure out why. @coderabbitai why is only amd64/linux failing? |
@faddat, it seems there was an issue with fetching the build logs due to an incorrect command usage. However, I was able to retrieve the list of recent changes made in the PR. The changes involve a significant number of files related to Given the scope of these changes, the failure on amd64/linux could be related to platform-specific behavior in the updated dependencies or the newly introduced code. It's also possible that there are Linux-specific compilation or runtime issues introduced by these changes, such as differences in how certain libraries or dependencies are handled on Linux compared to other platforms. To further diagnose the issue, I recommend checking the build logs for the amd64/linux build directly in your CI system or environment to identify the specific error messages or failures. Look for any errors that could be related to the changes made, especially those affecting platform-specific behavior, dependencies, or compilation. If you have access to the build logs and can share specific error messages or details, I could provide more targeted advice on resolving the issue. Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Fetch the latest build logs for amd64/linux
gh run list --workflow=build.yml --list-files | grep 'amd64/linux' | head -n 1 | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -I {} gh run download {} -D ./build-logs/
# Review recent changes made in the PR that could potentially affect the amd64/linux build
git diff HEAD~1 --name-only
Length of output: 3920 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume that we are importing all of these files, because we are having issues with importing them from upstream?
Does it make sense to upgrade to sdk v0.47.x?
@joe-bowman I made #1153 in order to resolve the platform specific issues. |
* update osmosis-types to v22; add concentrated-liquidity and poolmanager * update osmosis-types usages for v22 types * ensure pool and math dirs are included; update codecs for inclusion
* update osmosis-types to v22; add concentrated-liquidity and poolmanager * update osmosis-types usages for v22 types * ensure pool and math dirs are included; update codecs for inclusion
* Update osmosis deps (#1152) * update osmosis-types to v22; add concentrated-liquidity and poolmanager * update osmosis-types usages for v22 types * ensure pool and math dirs are included; update codecs for inclusion * remove wasm references from osmosis-types * lint --------- Co-authored-by: Jacob Gadikian <[email protected]>
1. Summary
Fixes #1151 - upgrade osmosis types to v22.0.5, in preparation for adding CL pools types to claims.
2.Type of change
3. Implementation details
gamm
,lockup
,osmomath
,osmoutils
.concentrated-liquidity
andpoolmanager
modules.tx/amino
in pb.go filesSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Documentation
Bug Fixes