-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make -Dquickly a bit faster #40966
Make -Dquickly a bit faster #40966
Conversation
3062c2e
to
9dc2082
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@@ -525,6 +525,7 @@ | |||
<executions> | |||
<execution> | |||
<id>enforce</id> | |||
<phase>${maven-enforcer-plugin.phase}</phase> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a neat trick! I have not realized the phase can be set through a property.
Yeah, Surefire, Failsafe, impsort, formatter and even quarkus-maven-plugin:build are other good candidates to be handled in the same way. |
Instantiation the plugins can actually be costly when we have so many artifacts. For now, I have only applied this trick where it makes a great difference and has a low cost of maintenance. We could also do it for Surefire. Per a discussion with @ppalaga.
9dc2082
to
3c88b37
Compare
Status for workflow
|
Instantiation the plugins can actually be costly when we have so many artifacts.
For now, I have only applied this trick where it makes a great difference and has a low cost of maintenance.
We could also do it for Surefire.
Per a discussion with @ppalaga.