Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: have vale lint only run on affected files #30378

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maxandersen
Copy link
Member

attempt on have vale lint only run on added/modified files.

for now just a draft as it passes all changed files to vale not just .adoc files.

@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Jan 14, 2023

Thanks for your pull request!

The title of your pull request does not follow our editorial rules. Could you have a look?

  • title should preferably start with an uppercase character (if it makes sense!)

This message is automatically generated by a bot.

@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added area/documentation area/infra-automation anything related to CI, bots, etc. that are used to automated our infrastructure labels Jan 14, 2023
@maxandersen maxandersen force-pushed the slimmervale branch 2 times, most recently from 296532e to cba55ea Compare January 14, 2023 08:42
@maxandersen maxandersen marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2023 08:52
@maxandersen
Copy link
Member Author

actually, looks like vale automatically only scans files that matches an extension it knows about adoc, markdown, etc.

thus not sure we even need to filter the incoming list?

@maxandersen
Copy link
Member Author

my only concern is why propertie files are set to be identified as markdown files?

that could generate warning noise. Any reason why vale would want to look at properties? (there are none in our docs sources atm)

@quarkus-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@@ -22,13 +22,17 @@ jobs:
steps:
- name: Checkout
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- id: files
uses: jitterbit/get-changed-files@v1
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have any alternative to offer right now, but jitterbit/get-changed-files#55 and the lack of recent activity in that repo might be issues worth considering.

Copy link
Contributor

@michelle-purcell michelle-purcell Jan 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@maxandersen &@famod -

On my sandbox, I tested the exact Vale configuration that is suggested in this PR and added yaml gradle dev ..bad stuff to catch vale! to line 58 in one file doc-contribute-docs-howto.adoc.

The jitterbit et al config updates in this PR work perfectly afaics! The Vale Job in the same PR containing 1 edited adoc file now only takes 2 seconds instead of 1minute and 5 seconds!! Super job 👍 Thank you for your help to tweak this.

I also submitted PR #30397 to target main with some tweaks to rules and the vale.ini as per the discussion above. Most of the config is optional and was specific to another project that checked .rst, properties, markdown and other doc source formats.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd suggest using a fork of that action which doesn't use the deprecated set-output command: jitterbit/get-changed-files#55 (comment)
(at least until the original action shows signs of improvement)

Copy link
Contributor

@michelle-purcell michelle-purcell Jan 17, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@famod & @maxandersen - FYI - The Vale GitHub action issue was just updated to report that a fix "should be out next week." The same contributor is also working on a performance fix relating to Vale unnecessarily running all files when the config is set to report only problems with the diff. 🤞 # 82.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@michelle-purcell got a link to that issue? if the vale github action is being updated we might just wait for that...

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okey so the fix they plan on next week is to just having the fail on error issue.

so i would say we merge what we have to getthe doc check to be much faster.

@famod
Copy link
Member

famod commented Jan 14, 2023

Any reason why vale would want to look at properties?

Resource bundles with localized strings maybe?

@maxandersen
Copy link
Member Author

Sure; but since we don't have those...could we remove that line and be done with it?

@michelle-purcell
Copy link
Contributor

my only concern is why propertie files are set to be identified as markdown files?

that could generate warning noise. Any reason why vale would want to look at properties? (there are none in our docs sources atm)

Hey @maxandersen

image
This is an optional mapping in the .vale.ini config file, which the Quarkus vale.ini inherited when copied over from the vale-at-red-hat repo. According to the Vale community docs, it's optional so Vale doesn't need it. I posted a Q in the vale-at-red-hat community slack channel to be sure there are no particular use cases/scenarios. (@rolfedh - are you aware of any?)

As we only want to check AsciiDoc files in one specific directory, I think we could also look at removing other optional config lines in https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/main/docs/.vale/vale.ini.

I'll do some tests on my sandbox with the minimum config + Quarks rules and will submit a PR with those tweaks.

Thanks

@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ As you make changes, you can rebuild the `docs` module specifically to update th
./mvnw -f docs clean install
----

yaml gradle dev ..bad stuff to catch vale!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 2 spelling warnings above for 'gradle' and 'yaml' are not correct. The spelling is OK but the CASE is not. I fixed these in PR #30397. With this fix you only get one Vale warning for 'gradle' and 'yaml' .

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just added those for test of the worflow. I'll get the pr updated to not include this before merging.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@maxandersen - Understood but the Vale rule results that were flagged on those terms didn't look good and needed some rule tweaks.

Copy link
Contributor

@michelle-purcell michelle-purcell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great improvement to the Vale linter job. Thank you ⭐

@quarkus-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@gsmet gsmet added the triage/needs-rebase This PR needs to be rebased first because it has merge conflicts label Feb 4, 2023
@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented May 3, 2023

Failing Jobs - Building 670bf99

Status Name Step Failures Logs Raw logs
JVM Tests - JDK 11 Build Failures Logs Raw logs
JVM Tests - JDK 17 Build Failures Logs Raw logs
JVM Tests - JDK 19 Build Failures Logs Raw logs

Full information is available in the Build summary check run.

Failures

⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 11 #

- Failing: extensions/jdbc/jdbc-oracle/deployment 
! Skipped: extensions/reactive-oracle-client/deployment integration-tests/jpa-oracle integration-tests/opentelemetry-jdbc-instrumentation and 1 more

📦 extensions/jdbc/jdbc-oracle/deployment

io.quarkus.jdbc.oracle.deployment.DevServicesOracleDatasourceTestCase. - More details - Source on GitHub

java.lang.RuntimeException: 
java.lang.RuntimeException: io.quarkus.builder.BuildException: Build failure: Build failed due to errors
	[error]: Build step io.quarkus.datasource.deployment.devservices.DevServicesDatasourceProcessor#launchDatabases threw an exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerLaunchException: Container startup failed for image docker.io/gvenzl/oracle-free:23-slim-faststart

⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 17 #

- Failing: extensions/jdbc/jdbc-oracle/deployment 
! Skipped: extensions/reactive-oracle-client/deployment integration-tests/jpa-oracle integration-tests/opentelemetry-jdbc-instrumentation and 1 more

📦 extensions/jdbc/jdbc-oracle/deployment

io.quarkus.jdbc.oracle.deployment.DevServicesOracleDatasourceTestCase. - More details - Source on GitHub

java.lang.RuntimeException: 
java.lang.RuntimeException: io.quarkus.builder.BuildException: Build failure: Build failed due to errors
	[error]: Build step io.quarkus.datasource.deployment.devservices.DevServicesDatasourceProcessor#launchDatabases threw an exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerLaunchException: Container startup failed for image docker.io/gvenzl/oracle-free:23-slim-faststart

⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 19 #

📦 extensions/jdbc/jdbc-oracle/deployment

io.quarkus.jdbc.oracle.deployment.DevServicesOracleDatasourceTestCase. - More details - Source on GitHub

java.lang.RuntimeException: 
java.lang.RuntimeException: io.quarkus.builder.BuildException: Build failure: Build failed due to errors
	[error]: Build step io.quarkus.datasource.deployment.devservices.DevServicesDatasourceProcessor#launchDatabases threw an exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerLaunchException: Container startup failed for image docker.io/gvenzl/oracle-free:23-slim-faststart

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/documentation area/infra-automation anything related to CI, bots, etc. that are used to automated our infrastructure triage/needs-rebase This PR needs to be rebased first because it has merge conflicts
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants