-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Take conditional annotations into account for Request and Response filters #29118
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm!
Failing Jobs - Building 0b512a3
Full information is available in the Build summary check run. Failures⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 17 MacOS M1 #- Failing: integration-tests/mailer integration-tests/smallrye-opentracing
📦 integration-tests/mailer✖
📦 integration-tests/smallrye-opentracing✖
|
…n methods Although we can make this work in the future, it involves a fair amount of work for a very small gain, so let's make it explicit for now that this combination is not allowed. Follows up on: quarkusio#29118 Relates to: quarkusio#29403
…n methods Although we can make this work in the future, it involves a fair amount of work for a very small gain, so let's make it explicit for now that this combination is not allowed. Follows up on: quarkusio#29118
Improve support for conditional bean and declarative filter annotations combination
…n methods Although we can make this work in the future, it involves a fair amount of work for a very small gain, so let's make it explicit for now that this combination is not allowed. Follows up on: quarkusio#29118 (cherry picked from commit 930744b)
That's fine with me. We can always reconcsider if users feel strongly about it |
Fixes: #29115