Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump log4j from 2.18.0 to 2.19.0 #28045

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2022
Merged

Conversation

knutwannheden
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added the area/dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Sep 19, 2022
@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Sep 19, 2022

Failing Jobs - Building f7fc6f4

Status Name Step Failures Logs Raw logs
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 11
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 17
JVM Tests - JDK 18 Build Failures Logs Raw logs
Quickstarts Compilation - JDK 17 Compile Quickstarts Failures Logs Raw logs

Full information is available in the Build summary check run.

Failures

⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 18 #

- Failing: devtools/cli 

📦 devtools/cli

io.quarkus.cli.CliProjectJBangTest.testCreateAppDefaults line 64 - More details - Source on GitHub

org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: 
Expected OK return code. Result:
result: {

⚙️ Quickstarts Compilation - JDK 17 #

- Failing: optaplanner-quickstart 

📦 optaplanner-quickstart

Failed to execute goal io.quarkus:quarkus-maven-plugin:999-SNAPSHOT:build (default) on project optaplanner-quickstart: Failed to build quarkus application

@gsmet
Copy link
Member

gsmet commented Sep 19, 2022

@knutwannheden any reason why you wanted this upgrade sooner rather than later? Wondering if there would be a good reason to backport?
Not sure it's important for us as we are only using the API.

@gsmet gsmet merged commit 1deb916 into quarkusio:main Sep 19, 2022
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 2.14 - main milestone Sep 19, 2022
@knutwannheden
Copy link
Contributor Author

@knutwannheden any reason why you wanted this upgrade sooner rather than later? Wondering if there would be a good reason to backport?

@gsmet We have a downstream project which wanted to use the new version. Since we extend the Quarkus platform we however don't want to override the versions of 3rd party dependencies unless required.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants