Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Port Spring Web to RESTEasy Reactive" #20400

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2021

Conversation

geoand
Copy link
Contributor

@geoand geoand commented Sep 26, 2021

This partially reverts commit bf55257
and completely reverts commit 76768cd.

This is done because it was discovered that this change could break applications that use Camel and Kogito.
The plan is to make the extension work with both RESTEasy Reactive and RESTEasy Classic for 2.4

This partially reverts commit bf55257
and completely reverts commit 76768cd.
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added area/documentation area/spring Issues relating to the Spring integration labels Sep 26, 2021
@geoand geoand requested a review from maxandersen September 26, 2021 20:01
Copy link
Member

@maxandersen maxandersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@geoand geoand added triage/waiting-for-ci Ready to merge when CI successfully finishes triage/backport? labels Sep 26, 2021
@geoand geoand merged commit 38525a7 into quarkusio:main Sep 27, 2021
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 2.4 - main milestone Sep 27, 2021
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot removed the triage/waiting-for-ci Ready to merge when CI successfully finishes label Sep 27, 2021
@geoand geoand deleted the spring-web-rr-revert branch September 27, 2021 06:22
@geoand geoand modified the milestones: 2.4 - main, 2.3.0.Final Sep 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/documentation area/spring Issues relating to the Spring integration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants