Support AsyncFile, Path. Added PathPart and FilePart

[FroMage]

This is the 1.13 version of #15891

[quarkus-bot]

This workflow status is outdated as a new workflow run has been triggered.

🚫 This workflow run has been cancelled.

Failing Jobs - Building 7b9fc5b

Status	Name	Step	Test failures	Logs	Raw logs
⌛	Initial JDK 11 Build	Build	⚠️ Check →	Logs	Raw logs
🚫	Devtools Tests - JDK ${{ matrix.java.name }}
🚫	Devtools Tests - JDK 11 Windows
🚫	Gradle Tests - JDK 11 ${{ matrix.os.family }}
🚫	JVM Tests - JDK ${{ matrix.java.name }}
🚫	JVM Tests - JDK 11 Windows
🚫	Maven Tests - JDK ${{ matrix.java.name }}
🚫	Maven Tests - JDK 11 Windows
🚫	MicroProfile TCKs Tests
🚫	Native Tests - ${{ matrix.category }}
🚫	Native Tests - Windows - ${{ matrix.category }}

[quarkus-bot]

This workflow status is outdated as a new workflow run has been triggered.

Failing Jobs - Building 653a8e6

Status	Name	Step	Test failures	Logs	Raw logs
✖	MicroProfile TCKs Tests	Run RESTEasy Reactive TCK	Test failures	Logs	Raw logs

Full information is available in the Build summary check run.

Test Failures

⚙️ MicroProfile TCKs Tests #

📦 resteasy-reactive-testsuite/tests

✖ com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs.spec.filter.interceptor.JAXRSClient0021.fileWriterClientInterceptorTest line 591 - More details - Source on GitHub

[geoand]

CI failure seems related

[FroMage]

It seems related. But this is for client interceptors, and that damn test runs locally…

[FroMage]

Ah, it's using the 1.13 branch of the TCK, I need to port the same fix there. Fine.

[FroMage]

Restarting CI, but it should be fine now.

[geoand]

👍🏼

[geoand]

Still failing:

Error:  Failures: 
Error:    JAXRSClient0021.fileWriterClientInterceptorTest:591->JaxrsCommonClient.invoke:212 [WebValidatorBase] Unable to find the following search string in the server's response: 'com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs.spec.filter.interceptor.EntityWriterInterceptor' at index: 0

[FroMage]

Well yeah, the stupid thing still checked out the previous version: 0ce5dbc724a688ff94da4b5755c9720c70a2bf0d

[FroMage]

So, restarted it again, but if it keeps taking the wrong commit, I don't know what to do.

[geoand]

If you pushed the TCK changes to the 1.13 branch, then CI should be fine because of https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/1.13/.github/workflows/ci-actions-incremental.yml#L600

[FroMage]

I did, and I checked it in github too. So either it's caching something, or I made a mistake I couldn't spot.

[geoand]

Let's see what happens :)

[geoand]

@gsmet this PR is against 1.13 as it's a feature we wanted to backport but that needed some work to adapt to Vert.x 3.9.x.
I assume we are OK to merge it?

[FroMage]

Yay, it passed!

[geoand]

@gsmet I am going to merge this, OK?

[cescoffier]

@geoand should this me merged?

[geoand]

I forgot about this one. Yes, I'm merging it, thanks!