Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable Java serialization only for GraalVM 21+ #15145

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 19, 2021

Conversation

gsmet
Copy link
Member

@gsmet gsmet commented Feb 17, 2021

Should fix #15085 .

@JiriOndrusek could you check serialization still works for you with GraalVM 21?
@Sgitario could you check things work fine with GraalVM 20.3? (I tested our Kafka IT but I'm not sure it's enough)

@JiriOndrusek
Copy link
Contributor

@gsmet I tested GraalVM 21.0.0 with quarkus from your branch and serialization works.

@gsmet
Copy link
Member Author

gsmet commented Feb 19, 2021

@Sgitario I let you confirm to me this fixes the issue you have. Thanks!

@Sgitario
Copy link
Contributor

@Sgitario I let you confirm to me this fixes the issue you have. Thanks!

I've verified this change and It's working fine. Thanks for fixing!

@gsmet
Copy link
Member Author

gsmet commented Feb 19, 2021

OK, thanks to both of you, I will merge then!

@gsmet gsmet merged commit d2d9db1 into quarkusio:master Feb 19, 2021
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 1.13 - master milestone Feb 19, 2021
@gsmet gsmet modified the milestones: 1.13 - master, 1.12.1.Final Feb 24, 2021
@rsvoboda
Copy link
Member

rsvoboda commented Feb 25, 2021

@gsmet seems that your change is now revealing an issue in version parsing for Mandrel
Mandrel is not working with Quarkus master / 1.12.1+

See graalvm/mandrel#218

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

jerboaa commented Feb 25, 2021

A fix is underway for this on the mandrel side. Sorry about that. No action needed from Quarkus.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unsupported type MethodAccessorGenerator on several extensions
5 participants