Update ecosystem #4651
Update ecosystem #4651
Conversation
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## High performance quantum circuit simulators | ||
|
|
||
| |Name|Main sponsor|Description| | ||
| |--- |--- |--- | | ||
| |[qsim](https://github.com/quantumlib/qsim)|Google|An open-source, high performance circuit simulator for Schrödinger simulations| | ||
| |[qflex](https://github.com/ngnrsaa/qflex)|NASA|An open-source, high performance circuit simulator for Feynman-based simulations optimized for GPUs| | ||
| |[quimb](https://github.com/jcmgray/quimb)|Johnny Gray|An open-source, high performance circuit simulator using tensor-networks| |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Out of curiosity: Why remove qflex?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cc: @95-martin-orion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The motivation for this was to focus communications around qsim as the "standard" simulator for Cirq. Separately, while qFlex was originally Cirq-compatible, it hasn't been maintained - I'm doubtful that it works with modern Cirq.
|
I've asked for feedback from PM and doc leads will wait for that response if there is more to update. |
|
Did not include rigetti since my understanding is that it is not yet complete. Question: should Stim be under simulators or libraries? Finally: missing any integrations that should be added? |
|
As mentioned in #4538, please also add under Quantum Cloud Services: Microsoft Azure Quantum :) |
|
Thanks @vcatherine have added all of these. |
dabacon
added
the
automerge
CirqBot
added
the
front_of_queue_automerge
CirqBot
removed
automerge
Addresses quantumlib#4538 quantumlib#4538 mentions "Application-related benchmarks" but I don't know what this refers to. @cognigami? * reworded services to be by type of quantum computer supported since it was getting to be redundant sentences. * Did not include rigetti since my understanding is that it is not yet complete. * Question: should Stim be under simulators or libraries? * Finally: missing any integrations that should be added?
Addresses #4538
#4538 mentions "Application-related benchmarks" but I don't know what this refers to. @cognigami?
reworded services to be by type of quantum computer supported since it was getting to be redundant sentences.
Did not include rigetti since my understanding is that it is not yet complete.
Question: should Stim be under simulators or libraries?
Finally: missing any integrations that should be added?