-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[4650][ADD] stock_valuation_fifo_lot #156
Open
AungKoKoLin1997
wants to merge
17
commits into
16.0
Choose a base branch
from
16.0-add-stock_valuation_fifo_lot
base: 16.0
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fe8efb7
[ADD] stock_valuation_fifo_lot
AungKoKoLin1997 86aef2f
[IMP] stock_valuation_fifo_lot: adjust view
AungKoKoLin1997 d4945b9
reflect oca changes
AungKoKoLin1997 84a2277
relect oca changes
AungKoKoLin1997 3f0c591
[RMV] stock_valuation_fifo_lot_mrp_landed_cost
AungKoKoLin1997 9d5d4d2
awesome improvements
yostashiro fa44d0d
add a means of resolving conflicts, update readme
yostashiro 647c3c0
adj, add tests
AungKoKoLin1997 88e3356
adj
AungKoKoLin1997 afbb94d
add qty_base to sml, refactor code
yostashiro adaaf0b
fixup!
yostashiro c227feb
fixup!
yostashiro 21c8a7e
fix
AungKoKoLin1997 d6f910c
fix post_init_hook, prevent negative valuation
yostashiro 94d03a6
remove _is_fifo()
yostashiro 7f11c13
upd tests
AungKoKoLin1997 4140a04
remove dependency
AungKoKoLin1997 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did this to solve the issue of below case.
With previous code, it will just deduct 1 unit from remaining qty of receiving SVL.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this the issue you mentioned about the Odoo core? If that is the case, we shouldn't be handling it in this module.
Anyway, I've changed the strategy to use the UoM of the product (not the move UoM) for all the added quantity columns in stock.move.line (for ease of balance comparison between stock valuation layers and stock move lines).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue I mentioned was not decreasing
qty_done
after product is delivered.This is for just receive and deliver with same
uom
that is not defaultuom
of product.