-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Keyboard] Add iNETT Studio SQUARE 80% #21082
Conversation
Hmm, is the lint error an issue? |
It doesn't exist under |
I see. |
{ "matrix": [5, 14], "x": 17.25, "y": 5.5 } | ||
] | ||
}, | ||
"LAYOUT_tkl_ansi_wkl": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry, I'm confused again.
Isn't this a textbook example of a WKL layout?
If we were to assume that I interpreted your other comment correct and that in QMK tsangan
only refers to the bottom row. Then tsangan_wkl
doesn't make sense, as it would be identical to wkl
. Which is exactly what you are saying. But surely we should prefer the most fundamental layout and use wkl
when referring to this layout?
If you really want me to, I will make the requested changes. But I can't help to feel like something isn't 100% right here.
Your As an aside, this may need a mild rename to disambiguate which PCBs are supported, because it's not 100% clear to me. The |
Honestly I'm not really sure which PCBs are compatible. I only have one of the hotswap WK ones. Though my assumption is that all of the QMK compatible PCBs are essentially the same from a matrix perspective. But due to the limitations with the hotswap sockets they can only support one layout at a time. Hence the different versions. But I have not real evidence to support this assumption. |
{ "matrix": [5, 4], "w": 1.5, "x": 0, "y": 5.5 }, | ||
{ "matrix": [5, 6], "w": 1.5, "x": 2.5, "y": 5.5 }, | ||
{ "matrix": [5, 7], "w": 7, "x": 4, "y": 5.5 }, | ||
{ "matrix": [5, 8], "w": 1.5, "x": 11, "y": 5.5 }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
quick check: Is matrix co-ordinate for this key (1.5u key right side of 7u spacebar) [5, 8]
or [5, 9]
?
842c49d
to
c23b7fd
Compare
I have spent some time looking into this a bit further, including digging out my SQ80 and looking at the PCB. The PCB I have is the "QMK WK Layout I" and it only has traces for that exact layout. This would indicate that each of the different layouts has unique PCBs. Which to be honest is exactly what the GB thread states. I have updated the PR to reflect this by adding it as a PCB subdir/revision. |
@Wraul |
Thank you for your contribution! |
This keyboard comes stock with a forked version of QMK that is quite outdated at this point. I decided to go with the name `sq80` to stay in line with the existing `sqx`, and "SQ80" has been used in some of the communication from the creators.
This keyboard comes stock with a forked version of QMK that is quite outdated at this point. I decided to go with the name `sq80` to stay in line with the existing `sqx`, and "SQ80" has been used in some of the communication from the creators.
This keyboard comes stock with a forked version of QMK that is quite outdated at this point. I decided to go with the name `sq80` to stay in line with the existing `sqx`, and "SQ80" has been used in some of the communication from the creators.
This keyboard comes stock with a forked version of QMK that is quite outdated at this point.
I decided to go with the name
sq80
to stay in line with the existingsqx
, and "SQ80" has been used in some of the communication from the creators.Description
Types of Changes
Checklist