Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

secp256k1: rewrite entire shard to 0.5 #57

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Apr 6, 2022
Merged

secp256k1: rewrite entire shard to 0.5 #57

merged 16 commits into from
Apr 6, 2022

Conversation

q9f
Copy link
Owner

@q9f q9f commented Apr 5, 2022

No description provided.

@q9f q9f marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2022 17:07
@q9f q9f changed the title secp256k1: rewrite entire gem to 0.5 secp256k1: rewrite entire shard to 0.5 Apr 5, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #57 (f02dd75) into main (adcb679) will increase coverage by 97.83%.
The diff coverage is 97.83%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           main      #57       +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage      0   97.83%   +97.83%     
=========================================
  Files         0        7        +7     
  Lines         0      231      +231     
=========================================
+ Hits          0      226      +226     
- Misses        0        5        +5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/secp256k1/context.cr 92.85% <92.85%> (ø)
src/secp256k1/util.cr 93.18% <93.18%> (ø)
src/secp256k1/curve.cr 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/secp256k1/key.cr 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/secp256k1/num.cr 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/secp256k1/point.cr 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/secp256k1/signature.cr 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

@q9f q9f merged commit 8a76ab0 into main Apr 6, 2022
@q9f q9f deleted the q9f/rewrite branch April 6, 2022 10:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants