Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP ci: Add label on pull request review approval #790

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

seemethere
Copy link
Member

Adds the ciflow/trunk label when a pull request is approved.

Ideally workflows should be added to coincide with this but ciflow/trunk does not currently exist.

NOTE: This currently does not work and is just a POC. I tried getting it to work here: seemethere/test-repo#37 but doesn't appear as though this current iteration has the necessary permissions.

Will re-visit when I have the time.

Adds the ciflow/trunk label when a pull request is approved.

Ideally workflows should be added to coincide with this but ciflow/trunk
does not currently exist

Signed-off-by: Eli Uriegas <[email protected]>
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 13, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/torchchat/790

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 88c712b with merge base 7c2d949 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot. label May 13, 2024
@Jack-Khuu
Copy link
Contributor

Closing old PRs to increase attention of new PRs

@Jack-Khuu Jack-Khuu closed this Jul 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants