Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Algorithm] Discrete IQL #1793

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jan 16, 2024
Merged

[Algorithm] Discrete IQL #1793

merged 10 commits into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

BY571
Copy link
Contributor

@BY571 BY571 commented Jan 12, 2024

Description

Adding discrete IQL Loss + example script.

Describe your changes in detail.

Motivation and Context

Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
You can use the syntax close #15213 if this solves the issue #15213

  • I have raised an issue to propose this change (required for new features and bug fixes)

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce? Remove all that do not apply:

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • [X ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds core functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation (update in the documentation)
  • Example (update in the folder of examples)

Checklist

Go over all the following points, and put an x in all the boxes that apply.
If you are unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We are here to help!

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTION guide (required)
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the tests accordingly (required for a bug fix or a new feature).
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 12, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/rl/1793

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (6 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit 65746f2 with merge base 5b3dd98 (image):

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jan 12, 2024
@BY571
Copy link
Contributor Author

BY571 commented Jan 12, 2024

Performance tested on CartPole:

image

Copy link
Contributor

@vmoens vmoens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM just some very minor changes to make! Thanks a million

examples/iql/discrete_iql.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/test_cost.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
torchrl/objectives/iql.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@vmoens vmoens added the new algo New algorithm request or PR label Jan 15, 2024
@vmoens
Copy link
Contributor

vmoens commented Jan 15, 2024

@BY571 we have a device exception that is being triggered

https://github.com/pytorch/rl/actions/runs/7530079022/job/20495721891?pr=1793

Do you know why?

Copy link
Contributor

@vmoens vmoens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks for this

@vmoens vmoens merged commit 69f3c4e into pytorch:main Jan 16, 2024
57 of 63 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. new algo New algorithm request or PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants