-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor to use traverse_dps
instead of traverse
#793
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: 121b33a125ab7675d828021ea1f12cc39e669276 Pull Request resolved: #793
traverse_dps
instead of traverse
@NivekT has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Let's wait until the nightly is updated. And, we can't land this PR right now since the PyTorch core Diff has not been merged yet.
There is a circular import issue. Let me have a look tomorrow. |
This should be merged only after pytorch/pytorch#85667 has been merged into nightly and internal. Differential Revision: [D39860692](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39860692) [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: a474d582b9361fe04bb413b56c345ad7b3f4849c Pull Request resolved: #793
@NivekT has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
1 similar comment
@NivekT has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Stack from ghstack:
traverse_dps
instead oftraverse
#793This should be merged only after pytorch/pytorch#85667 has been merged into nightly and internal.
Differential Revision: D39860692