Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.11] gh-92611: Clarify planned removal version in PEP 594-deprecated modules (GH-92793) #93026

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented May 20, 2022

As discussed in GH-92611 and GH-92564 and as a followup to PR GH-92612 , this 3.11+ only PR uses the proper deprecated-removed role for the modules deprecated by PEP 593 (PEP-594) to clearly indicate to users that a removal version is planned and what it is, so they can prepare accordingly or voice any unanticipated impacts.

Related to GH-92792 ; if we decide to backport that PR, the upgrade to using deprecated-removed on those functions can be moved to this one.
(cherry picked from commit 31fa41e)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach [email protected]

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon

… modules (pythonGH-92793)

As discussed in pythonGH-92611 and pythonGH-92564 and as a followup to PR pythonGH-92612 , this 3.11+ only PR uses the proper `deprecated-removed` role for the modules deprecated by PEP 593 (PEP-594) to clearly indicate to users that a removal version is planned and what it is, so they can prepare accordingly or voice any unanticipated impacts.

Related to pythonGH-92792 ; if we decide to backport that PR, the upgrade to using `deprecated-removed` on those functions can be moved to this one.
(cherry picked from commit 31fa41e)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added skip news docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels May 20, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@brettcannon brettcannon merged commit 24223ec into python:3.11 May 20, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-31fa41e-3.11 branch May 20, 2022 22:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants