[3.7] bpo-39847: EnterNonRecursiveMutex() uses GetTickCount64() (GH-18780) #18959
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…onGH-18780) The 32-bit (49-day) TickCount relied on in EnterNonRecursiveMutex can overflow in the gap between the 'target' time and the 'now' time WaitForSingleObjectEx returns, causing the loop to think it needs to wait another 49 days. This is most likely to happen when the machine is hibernated during WaitForSingleObjectEx. This makes acquiring a lock/event/etc from the _thread or threading module appear to never timeout. Replace with GetTickCount64 - this is OK now Python no longer supports XP which lacks it, and is in use for time.monotonic(). Co-authored-by: And Clover <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 64838ce) Co-authored-by: bobince <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The 32-bit (49-day) TickCount relied on in EnterNonRecursiveMutex can overflow
in the gap between the 'target' time and the 'now' time WaitForSingleObjectEx
returns, causing the loop to think it needs to wait another 49 days. This is
most likely to happen when the machine is hibernated during
WaitForSingleObjectEx.
This makes acquiring a lock/event/etc from the _thread or threading module
appear to never timeout.
Replace with GetTickCount64 - this is OK now Python no longer supports XP which
lacks it, and is in use for time.monotonic().
Co-authored-by: And Clover [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 64838ce)
Co-authored-by: bobince [email protected]
https://bugs.python.org/issue39847
Automerge-Triggered-By: @vstinner