Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.11] gh-115011: Improve support of __index__() in setters of members with unsigned integer type (GH-115029) #115295

Merged

Conversation

serhiy-storchaka
Copy link
Member

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka commented Feb 11, 2024

Setters for members with an unsigned integer type now support the same range of valid values for objects that has a index() method as for int.

Previously, Py_T_UINT, Py_T_ULONG and Py_T_ULLONG did not support objects that has a index() method larger than LONG_MAX.

Py_T_ULLONG did not support negative ints. Now it supports them and emits a RuntimeWarning.
(cherry picked from commit d9d6909)

…members with unsigned integer type (pythonGH-115029)

Setters for members with an unsigned integer type now support
the same range of valid values for objects that has a __index__()
method as for int.

Previously, Py_T_UINT, Py_T_ULONG and Py_T_ULLONG did not support
objects that has a __index__() method larger than LONG_MAX.

Py_T_ULLONG did not support negative ints. Now it supports them and
emits a RuntimeWarning.
(cherry picked from commit d9d6909)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant