-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-49766: Make date-datetime comparison more symmetric and flexible #114760
Merged
serhiy-storchaka
merged 9 commits into
python:main
from
serhiy-storchaka:date-datetime-comparison
Feb 11, 2024
Merged
gh-49766: Make date-datetime comparison more symmetric and flexible #114760
serhiy-storchaka
merged 9 commits into
python:main
from
serhiy-storchaka:date-datetime-comparison
Feb 11, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ible Now the special comparison methods like `__eq__` and `__lt__` return NotImplemented if one of comparands is date and other is datetime instead of ignoring the time part and the time zone or forcefully return "not equal" or raise TypeError. It makes comparison of date and datetime subclasses more symmetric and allows to change the default behavior by overriding the special comparison methods in subclasses. It is now the same as if date and datetime was independent classes.
I'll update docs after merging #114749. |
fsc-eriker
pushed a commit
to fsc-eriker/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2024
…ible (pythonGH-114760) Now the special comparison methods like `__eq__` and `__lt__` return NotImplemented if one of comparands is date and other is datetime instead of ignoring the time part and the time zone or forcefully return "not equal" or raise TypeError. It makes comparison of date and datetime subclasses more symmetric and allows to change the default behavior by overriding the special comparison methods in subclasses. It is now the same as if date and datetime was independent classes.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now the special comparison methods like
__eq__
and__lt__
return NotImplemented if one of comparands is date and other is datetime instead of ignoring the time part and the time zone or forcefully return "not equal" or raise TypeError.It makes comparison of date and datetime subclasses more symmetric and allows to change the default behavior by overriding the special comparison methods in subclasses.
It is now the same as if date and datetime was independent classes.