-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a temporal validation period to synthetic control and interrupted time series experiments #367
Open
drbenvincent
wants to merge
11
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
validation
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+479
−63
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a7e8596
add PrePostFitWithValidation and SyntheticControlWithValidation classes
drbenvincent 044a47d
update synthetic control notebook
drbenvincent f3110cd
add InterruptedTimeSeriesWithValidation + update notebooks
drbenvincent 2203ae3
update uml diagram
drbenvincent 50898be
simplify implementation significantly
drbenvincent 0d19aa1
calculate R2 for validation phase when it is present
drbenvincent 0ca9187
goodness of fit calculations + update summary method + plots
drbenvincent 6970cd1
update docstrings + add input validation
drbenvincent bb0b937
add test coverage for validation_time kwarg
drbenvincent 3ce5d33
test ValueException when validation_time > treatment_time
drbenvincent 444e363
Merge branch 'main' into validation
drbenvincent File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think we could replace on validation score by
bayesian tail prob
instead of R2? So, the interpretation here is about how much the real mean during the validation diverge from the posterior mean.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure. Just looking into it so that I get it right - I just need the high level algorithm because I've not heard that much about it. Google search for "bayesian tail probability" shows very few hits. Is this a widely used approach? Doesn't matter if not, as long as it does what we want :)