Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add submission_script_path to write run_queue.sh script to a different location #364

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Nov 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an optional submission_script_path parameter in the job submission process, allowing users to specify the script's location.
    • Updated documentation to reflect the new parameter and its purpose.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling for whitespace in the working directory during job submissions.
  • Refactor

    • Improved clarity in variable naming related to script paths across multiple components.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to enhance the job submission functionality across several classes in the pysqa module. Key changes include the addition of a new optional parameter, submission_script_path, to the submit_job methods in QueueAdapterCore, ModularQueueAdapter, and QueueAdapter. This parameter allows users to specify the path for the submission script. Updates to internal methods ensure that the new parameter is properly utilized, while error handling remains consistent.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
pysqa/base/core.py - Updated submit_job, _write_queue_script, and _list_command_to_be_executed methods to include submission_script_path.
- Adjusted internal logic and return values accordingly.
pysqa/base/modular.py - Renamed queue_script_path to submission_script_path in the submit_job method implementation.
pysqa/queueadapter.py - Updated submit_job method to include submission_script_path and modified the docstring to reflect this change.
- Updated call to self._adapter.submit_job to pass the new parameter.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the land of queues, where jobs do play,
A new path for scripts has come our way.
With submission_script_path, so neat and fine,
Our job submissions now truly shine!
Hopping through code, with joy we leap,
For clearer paths, our hearts do keep! 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jan-janssen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 40d00a5 and af73b6b.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pysqa/queueadapter.py (1)

216-217: Enhance parameter documentation

While the documentation is clear, it would be helpful to add more details about:

  • Expected format for the path (absolute vs relative)
  • Behavior when the directory in the path doesn't exist
  • Default behavior when submission_script_path is None

Consider updating the docstring to:

-            submission_script_path (str/None): path to write the submission script to.
+            submission_script_path (str/None): Absolute or relative path where the submission script will be written.
+                                             If None, uses the default location. Directory must exist.
pysqa/base/core.py (1)

Line range hint 356-397: Update docstring to document new parameter and return values.

The implementation looks good, but the docstring needs to be updated to:

  1. Document the new submission_script_path parameter
  2. Clarify that the return tuple contains (working_directory, submission_script_path)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 40d00a5 and af73b6b.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • pysqa/base/core.py (7 hunks)
  • pysqa/base/modular.py (2 hunks)
  • pysqa/queueadapter.py (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
pysqa/base/modular.py (3)

Line range hint 76-92: Consider updating tests for the new submission script path functionality

The changes to support custom submission script paths should be covered by tests to ensure proper handling across different cluster configurations.

#!/bin/bash
# Search for relevant test files and test cases
fd "test.*\.py" | xargs rg -l "submit_job|_write_queue_script"

90-92: LGTM! Using named parameters improves clarity.

The use of named parameters makes the code more explicit and maintainable. However, let's verify the parent class implementation accepts this parameter.

✅ Verification successful

Parameter usage is correct and consistent with parent class implementation

The verification shows that _list_command_to_be_executed in the parent class (pysqa/base/core.py) accepts submission_script_path as a parameter with the exact same name, making this usage correct and consistent with the parent implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for _list_command_to_be_executed implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'def _list_command_to_be_executed($$$)'

Length of output: 394


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for _list_command_to_be_executed implementation with ripgrep
rg -A 5 "_list_command_to_be_executed" --type py

Length of output: 6189


Line range hint 76-82: Verify parent class compatibility

The code now expects _write_queue_script to return both working_directory and submission_script_path. Let's verify this change is consistent with the parent class implementation.

✅ Verification successful

Parent class implementation is compatible with the changes

The verification shows that both the parent class (pysqa/base/core.py) and the child class (pysqa/base/modular.py) use the same pattern of unpacking two values (working_directory and submission_script_path) from _write_queue_script. The parent class implementation already includes the submission_script_path parameter, making this change consistent with the inheritance hierarchy.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for _write_queue_script implementation in parent classes
ast-grep --pattern 'def _write_queue_script($$$)'

Length of output: 394


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for _write_queue_script implementation using ripgrep
rg -A 10 "_write_queue_script" --type py

Length of output: 4777

pysqa/queueadapter.py (1)

234-234: Verify adapter implementations

The parameter forwarding looks good, but we should ensure all queue adapter implementations (QueueAdapterCore, ModularQueueAdapter, RemoteQueueAdapter) support the new submission_script_path parameter to prevent runtime errors.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the parameter support across adapter implementations.

Parameter submission_script_path is properly supported across adapter implementations

The verification shows that the parameter is consistently implemented:

  • QueueAdapterCore (in base/core.py) fully supports it in both the submit_job method and helper methods
  • ModularQueueAdapter (in base/modular.py) properly handles it in its implementation
  • No RemoteQueueAdapter was found in the codebase, suggesting it was either removed or renamed
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all adapter implementations support the new parameter
# Look for submit_job method implementations in all adapter classes
ast-grep --pattern 'class $ADAPTER:
  $$$
  def submit_job($$$):
    $$$'

# Also check for any existing usages of the new parameter
rg "submission_script_path" --type py

Length of output: 1667

pysqa/base/core.py (3)

149-150: LGTM! The submission_script_path parameter is well integrated.

The changes to submit_job are consistent and well-implemented:

  • Parameter is properly typed and optional
  • Documentation is clear
  • Parameter is correctly propagated to helper methods

Also applies to: 164-165, 176-186, 190-191


304-304: LGTM! Parameter renaming is consistent.

The renaming of queue_script_path to submission_script_path is consistent with the changes throughout the class, and the docstring has been properly updated.

Also applies to: 309-309, 314-314


304-314: Verify parameter name changes across the codebase.

Let's ensure all callers have been updated to use submission_script_path instead of queue_script_path.

✅ Verification successful

Parameter name change is consistent across the codebase

The verification shows that:

  • No occurrences of the old parameter name queue_script_path were found
  • All uses of submission_script_path are consistent throughout the codebase
  • All calls to _list_command_to_be_executed use the correct parameter name submission_script_path
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining uses of queue_script_path
rg "queue_script_path" --type python

# Search for uses of the new parameter name
rg "submission_script_path" --type python

# Search for calls to _list_command_to_be_executed to verify parameter usage
ast-grep --pattern '_list_command_to_be_executed\($$$\)'

Length of output: 199


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining uses of queue_script_path
rg "queue_script_path"

# Search for uses of the new parameter name
rg "submission_script_path"

# Search for method calls using ast-grep with a more specific pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'self._list_command_to_be_executed($_)'

Length of output: 2057

@@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ def submit_job(
dependency_list: Optional[List[str]] = None,
command: Optional[str] = None,
submission_template: Optional[Union[str, Template]] = None,
submission_script_path: Optional[str] = None,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Parent class signature needs to be updated

The submission_script_path parameter is not present in the parent class QueueAdapterAbstractClass in pysqa/base/abstract.py. Adding this parameter to the child class without updating the parent class violates the Liskov Substitution Principle. The abstract base class should be updated first to include this parameter.

  • pysqa/base/abstract.py: Update QueueAdapterAbstractClass.submit_job() method signature to include the submission_script_path parameter
  • pysqa/base/core.py: Update the intermediate implementation if present
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify parent class method signature

The addition of the submission_script_path parameter looks good, but we should ensure this change is consistent with the parent class QueueAdapterAbstractClass.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the parent class method signature is compatible
# Look for the abstract class definition and its submit_job method
ast-grep --pattern 'class QueueAdapterAbstractClass:
  $$$
  def submit_job($$$):
    $$$'

Length of output: 92


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the parent class and its method signature
# First, let's find all Python files that might contain QueueAdapterAbstractClass
fd '.*\.py$' --exec rg -l 'QueueAdapterAbstractClass'

# Then, let's look for the actual class definition and method signature with context
rg -A 10 'class QueueAdapterAbstractClass' '*.py'

Length of output: 220


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Now that we found the files, let's check each one for the class definition
echo "=== Checking pysqa/base/abstract.py ==="
rg -A 10 'class QueueAdapterAbstractClass' pysqa/base/abstract.py

echo "=== Checking pysqa/base/core.py ==="
rg -A 10 'class QueueAdapterAbstractClass' pysqa/base/core.py

echo "=== Checking submit_job method signature ==="
rg -B 2 -A 5 'def submit_job' pysqa/base/abstract.py pysqa/base/core.py

Length of output: 1717

@jan-janssen jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft November 15, 2024 22:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[feature] Add option to write submission script to temporary directory
1 participant