Move selection of queue type to a dictionary #335
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@jan-janssen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new dictionary, Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pysqa/utils/basic.py (2)
17-50: LGTM! Consider using an Enum for queue types.The introduction of
queue_type_dictis a good improvement, making the code more maintainable and easier to extend. It provides a clear mapping between queue types and their corresponding class and module names.Consider using an Enum for the queue types to improve type safety and prevent typos. For example:
from enum import Enum, auto class QueueType(Enum): SGE = auto() TORQUE = auto() SLURM = auto() LSF = auto() MOAB = auto() GENT = auto() REMOTE = auto() FLUX = auto() queue_type_dict = { QueueType.SGE: { "class_name": "SunGridEngineCommands", "module_name": "pysqa.wrapper.sge", }, # ... (rest of the dictionary) }This change would require updating the dictionary usage elsewhere in the code, but it would provide better type checking and autocomplete support.
79-87: LGTM! Minor optimization suggested.The usage of
queue_type_dictis a good improvement over the previous conditional statements. It makes the code more maintainable and provides a clear error message with supported queue types.Consider a minor optimization based on the static analysis hint:
-if self._config["queue_type"] in queue_type_dict.keys(): +if self._config["queue_type"] in queue_type_dict: class_name = queue_type_dict[self._config["queue_type"]]["class_name"] module_name = queue_type_dict[self._config["queue_type"]]["module_name"] else: raise ValueError( "The queue_type " + self._config["queue_type"] + " is not found in the list of supported queue types " - + str(list(queue_type_dict.keys())) + + str(list(queue_type_dict)) )This change improves performance slightly by avoiding the creation of a
dict_keysobject.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
79-79: Use
key in dictinstead ofkey in dict.keys()Remove
.keys()(SIM118)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- pysqa/utils/basic.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
pysqa/utils/basic.py
79-79: Use
key in dictinstead ofkey in dict.keys()Remove
.keys()(SIM118)
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pysqa/utils/basic.py (1)
54-77: Great improvement to theget_queue_commandsfunction!The updated implementation leverages the new
queue_type_dict, making it more concise and easier to maintain. It properly handles unsupported queue types by raising a ValueError with a helpful message. The function now correctly returns None for the "REMOTE" queue type, consistent with the dictionary definition.Consider using a list comprehension to create the list of supported queue types in the error message:
- + str(list(queue_type_dict.keys())) + + ", ".join(queue_type_dict.keys())This change would make the error message more readable by presenting the queue types as a comma-separated list instead of a Python list representation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
64-64: Use
key in dictinstead ofkey in dict.keys()Remove
.keys()(SIM118)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- pysqa/utils/basic.py (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
pysqa/utils/basic.py
64-64: Use
key in dictinstead ofkey in dict.keys()Remove
.keys()(SIM118)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pysqa/utils/basic.py (3)
18-51: Excellent refactoring with the introduction ofqueue_type_dict!This change significantly improves code organization and maintainability. By centralizing the queue type information in a dictionary, it becomes much easier to add or modify queue types in the future. The structure is consistent and easy to understand, which enhances readability.
185-185: Excellent improvements to method signatures!The updates to method signatures, using
Union[type, None]instead of just the type, significantly improve type hinting. This change makes the code more robust and easier to understand, especially for methods that may return None in certain cases. The more specific return type annotation forcheck_queue_parametersprovides better information for static type checkers and developers.These changes are consistent with Python typing best practices and will help catch potential type-related issues earlier in the development process.
Also applies to: 259-259, 306-306, 382-389
Line range hint
1-768: Overall excellent refactoring and improvements!This pull request introduces several valuable changes:
- The introduction of
queue_type_dictsignificantly improves code organization and maintainability.- The
get_queue_commandsfunction has been refactored to use the new dictionary, making it more concise and robust.- Method signatures have been updated with improved type hinting, enhancing code clarity and catching potential issues earlier.
These changes collectively make the code more maintainable, easier to understand, and less prone to errors. Great job on this refactoring effort!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
64-64: Use
key in dictinstead ofkey in dict.keys()Remove
.keys()(SIM118)
| Returns: | ||
| SchedulerCommands: queuing system commands class instance | ||
| """ | ||
| if queue_type in queue_type_dict.keys(): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Minor optimization suggestion
Consider simplifying the condition in the if statement:
- if queue_type in queue_type_dict.keys():
+ if queue_type in queue_type_dict:This change slightly improves performance and aligns with Python best practices. It's a minor optimization, but it makes the code more idiomatic.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if queue_type in queue_type_dict.keys(): | |
| if queue_type in queue_type_dict: |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
64-64: Use
key in dictinstead ofkey in dict.keys()Remove
.keys()(SIM118)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Noneas a return type in several functions.