Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert to mpi4py 3.1.6 #235

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

Revert to mpi4py 3.1.6 #235

merged 10 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Jul 31, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved performance of tests by adjusting the processing capabilities in the test suite.
  • Tests

    • Enhanced the test_static method to utilize increased parallel processing, which may lead to more efficient test execution.
  • Chores

    • Updated dependency specifications for mpich and lammps in the environment configuration for better package management.
    • Refined dependency specifications for openmpi and lammps to ensure compatibility with the specified MPI implementation.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jan-janssen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 13 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3af3153 and 979b5a1.

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the LammpsASELibrary within the test_static method of the TestLammpsASELibrary test case by increasing the cores parameter from 1 to 2, likely boosting parallel processing capabilities during testing. Additionally, the dependency specifications in both the .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml and .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml files have been refined to ensure compatibility with specific versions of lammps and the respective MPI implementations, improving clarity and robustness in environment configuration.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/test_ase_interface.py Updated the cores parameter from 1 to 2 in the LammpsASELibrary instantiation in test_static.
.ci_support/environment-mpich.yml, Specified mpich version as 4.2.2 and refined lammps version constraint to *_mpi_mpich_*.
.ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml Specified openmpi version as 4.1.6 and refined lammps version constraint to *_mpi_openmpi_*.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as TestLammpsASELibrary
    participant LammpsASE as LammpsASELibrary

    Test->>LammpsASE: Instantiate with cores=2
    LammpsASE-->>Test: Ready for parallel processing
    Note right of LammpsASE: Improved performance likely
Loading

Poem

🐇 In fields so green, a change we see,
Two cores now dance, in harmony!
The tests will run, with speed and cheer,
A leap of joy, our goals are near!
So hop along, in code we trust,
For progress sweet, in rabbits we must! 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44902b3 and 7bb1682.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_ase_interface.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/test_ase_interface.py (1)

24-24: LGTM! But verify the consistency of the cores parameter across the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that the cores parameter is consistently used across the codebase.

Verification successful

The cores parameter is used consistently across the codebase with appropriate values based on the context.

  • Instances of cores with values 1, 2, and 8 were found in various test files and implementation files.
  • The change from cores=1 to cores=2 in tests/test_ase_interface.py is consistent with the usage pattern in other parts of the codebase.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of the `cores` parameter across the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `cores` parameter. Expect: Consistent usage of the `cores` parameter.
rg --type python -A 5 'cores='

Length of output: 61


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of the `cores` parameter across the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `cores` parameter. Expect: Consistent usage of the `cores` parameter.
rg -t py -A 5 'cores='

Length of output: 7992

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7bb1682 and 3af3153.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml (1 hunks)
  • .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.ci_support/environment-mpich.yml (2)

5-5: LGTM! The lammps dependency update is appropriate.

The update to include the specific MPI variant ensures compatibility with the specified MPI implementation.


6-6: LGTM! The mpich dependency update is appropriate.

Explicitly setting the version to 4.2.2 helps avoid compatibility issues.

.ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml (2)

5-5: LGTM! The lammps dependency update is appropriate.

The update to include the specific MPI variant ensures compatibility with the specified MPI implementation.


6-6: LGTM! The openmpi dependency update is appropriate.

Explicitly setting the version to 4.1.6 helps avoid compatibility issues.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen changed the title Test mpi4py 4.0.0 Revert to mpi4py 3.1.6 Jul 31, 2024
@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 9c68f4c into main Jul 31, 2024
14 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the debug_tests branch July 31, 2024 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant