Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix dimension in edge filter selection #4629

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 12, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Padarn
Copy link
Contributor

@Padarn Padarn commented May 12, 2022

Aims to fix an issue reported in #4026. The filtering of attributes that have the same shape as edge_index are not handled correctly. This PR tries to fix that behaviour

@Padarn Padarn changed the title fix dimension in edge filter Fix dimension in edge filter selection May 12, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 12, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #4629 (ea6cb84) into master (bbff5b7) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 75.00%.

❗ Current head ea6cb84 differs from pull request most recent head 201a053. Consider uploading reports for the commit 201a053 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4629   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.88%   82.88%           
=======================================
  Files         316      316           
  Lines       16677    16678    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        13823    13824    +1     
  Misses       2854     2854           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
torch_geometric/loader/utils.py 78.02% <75.00%> (+0.24%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bbff5b7...201a053. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@rusty1s rusty1s left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should fix this for node attributes as well, right?

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rusty1s rusty1s merged commit 6fd6f5b into pyg-team:master May 12, 2022
@Padarn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Padarn commented May 12, 2022

Agreed, I'll do that.

Edit: oh I see you did it for me, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants