restore pypy builds for x86_64

[davidhewitt]

Change Summary

Reworks CI to include x86_64 pypy builds, which were removed from PGO optimization in #1063

I restructured the build matrix a bit into something which is hopefully a bit more obvious what we're choosing to build.

Related issue number

Fixes #1071

Checklist

• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
• Pydantic tests pass with this pydantic-core (except for expected changes)
• My PR is ready to review, please add a comment including the phrase "please review" to assign reviewers

Selected Reviewer: @adriangb

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1072 will degrade performances by 24.61%

_{Comparing dh/rework-build-matrix (df4e8ac) with main (baed943)}

Summary

❌ 1 regressions
✅ 139 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	main	dh/rework-build-matrix	Change
❌	test_dont_raise_error	29.3 µs	38.9 µs	-24.61%

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1072 (df4e8ac) into main (fbae08c) will not change coverage.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1072   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.63%   89.63%           
=======================================
  Files         106      106           
  Lines       16391    16391           
  Branches       35       35           
=======================================
  Hits        14692    14692           
  Misses       1692     1692           
  Partials        7        7           

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update baed943...df4e8ac. Read the comment docs.

[davidhewitt]

please review

[MarshalX]

hi @davidhewitt! could you pls explain this comment? Thank you

upd. i mean as far as i know (and use) apple silicon is supported since python 3.8
upd2. ah. that's just because of actions/setup-python@v5? xd

[davidhewitt]

Yes that was purely limited by what we could download to run the build, IIRC.