Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

General thermal bcs #3330

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 19, 2023
Merged

General thermal bcs #3330

merged 7 commits into from
Sep 19, 2023

Conversation

rtimms
Copy link
Contributor

@rtimms rtimms commented Sep 13, 2023

Description

Fixes some bugs with the pouch cell thermal models that were introduced when we switched from a dimensionless to a dimensional formulation. Specifically, this adds a missing thermal conductivity (in the previous formulation the dimensionless effective conductivity was 1 due to the choice of non-dimensionalisation, which is why it was missed).

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please add a line in the relevant section of CHANGELOG.md to document the change (include PR #) - note reverse order of PR #s. If necessary, also add to the list of breaking changes.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (back-end change that speeds up the code)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Key checklist:

  • No style issues: $ pre-commit run (or $ nox -s pre-commit) (see CONTRIBUTING.md for how to set this up to run automatically when committing locally, in just two lines of code)
  • All tests pass: $ python run-tests.py --all (or $ nox -s tests)
  • The documentation builds: $ python run-tests.py --doctest (or $ nox -s doctests)

You can run integration tests, unit tests, and doctests together at once, using $ python run-tests.py --quick (or $ nox -s quick).

Further checks:

  • Code is commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Tests added that prove fix is effective or that feature works

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 94.17% and project coverage change: +0.02% 🎉

Comparison is base (7cba890) 99.55% compared to head (8af2430) 99.57%.
Report is 30 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3330      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    99.55%   99.57%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          253      253              
  Lines        19553    19571      +18     
===========================================
+ Hits         19466    19488      +22     
+ Misses          87       83       -4     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
...bamm/expression_tree/operations/evaluate_python.py 99.29% <ø> (ø)
...mal/pouch_cell/pouch_cell_2D_current_collectors.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
pybamm/solvers/solution.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
pybamm/solvers/jax_solver.py 90.69% <79.31%> (-6.08%) ⬇️
pybamm/experiment/experiment.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...dels/submodels/current_collector/potential_pair.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...mal/pouch_cell/pouch_cell_1D_current_collectors.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pybamm/parameters/bpx.py 99.49% <100.00%> (+4.73%) ⬆️
pybamm/parameters/lithium_ion_parameters.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pybamm/parameters/thermal_parameters.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 4 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@brosaplanella brosaplanella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

@rtimms rtimms merged commit 2eb5c59 into develop Sep 19, 2023
29 of 32 checks passed
@rtimms rtimms deleted the general-thermal-bcs branch September 19, 2023 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants