Add code of conduct & guidelines refs to presubmission template #66
Conversation
|
|
||
| **P.S.** *Have feedback/comments about our review process? Leave a comment [here][Comments] | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| [PackageCategories]: https://www.pyopensci.org/contributing-guide/open-source-software-peer-review/aims-and-scope.html?highlight=data#package-categories | ||
|
|
||
| [Conduct]: https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/about-peer-review/code-of-conduct.html |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lwasser Am I going too far with this?
On the one hand, "better safe than sorry." On the other, this could seem a bit rough for first contact.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
oh so sorry i didn't respond here @Batalex i'm just seeing this. We actually have a. new COC but our board has to approve it. you can see it here - pyOpenSci/handbook#31
i haven't posted it for review yet because the board wanted to see it first. so i DO NOT think you are going too far! but do you mind if we hold of on merging until i have this new COC in place? i hope in a month that will happen! thank you so much for taking the initiative here to submit this PR i think it is great.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not too far at all! i am going to merge this and then will updtae the link as we have a new COC link now. this is awesome @Batalex THANK YOU for it. Sorry it took me some time to get to this pr - i wanted to get the COC approved first and published and such!
|
|
||
| **P.S.** *Have feedback/comments about our review process? Leave a comment [here][Comments] | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| [PackageCategories]: https://www.pyopensci.org/contributing-guide/open-source-software-peer-review/aims-and-scope.html?highlight=data#package-categories | ||
|
|
||
| [Conduct]: https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/about-peer-review/code-of-conduct.html | ||
|
|
||
| [Commitment]: https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/about-peer-review/policies-guidelines.html#after-acceptance-package-ownership-and-maintenance |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is also great! we could even make these things check boxes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you prefer to have two separate checkboxes than one now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i think two is preferred. i am updating links locally to the new coc and adding pangeo. how about i add two and then you can have a look at my pr to make sure i'm incorporating what you have here and your ideas about what this should look like!!
@Batalex the wording of things is great! thank you for this. I'm going to push up a new pr soon with a few more added things. would love your review after! |
|
@all-contributors please add @Batalex for code, design, review |
|
I've put up a pull request to add @Batalex! 🎉 |
Feel free to reword as needed. Since I am not a native speaker, some turns of phrases may sound odd at times.