-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run more tests #603
Run more tests #603
Conversation
Ah, I didn't notice that the IV part in |
Yeah, me neither; a seemingly innocuuous "skip" statement and I asked pytest to skip all IV tests 🤦♂️Yeah, generally I agree that all is fine - coefs, SEs etc are all correct. I think something broke with |
Hi @s3alfisc ! I will check on this issue as soon as possible, possibly this weekend. |
Very cool! I think reviewing the IV parts should not take you more than 15 minutes =) |
Hi @Jayhyung, I will likely merge this in a few hours as I need this in another PR. If you find the time, would nevertheless be great if you'd review the IV part (we can always revert / update in case something is off / you think smth should be improved). |
Thanks for the reminder, @s3alfisc ! Please, proceed without my review at this moment. Sorry, I will take a look at some point today, as I was swamped by my stuffs ;). If i find something weird or does not not work, I will make a new issue or PR. |
Sounds good and no worries at all! |
first_stage()
method with specialformulaic
syntax.resid()
method, which sometimes would return weighted residuals. Now it always returns the unweighted residuals.predict()
,resid()
methods andiwls_weights
attributes.