Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed references to font-awesome #13

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 1, 2015
Merged

Removed references to font-awesome #13

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 1, 2015

Conversation

jalbr74
Copy link
Contributor

@jalbr74 jalbr74 commented Nov 23, 2015

Changed all css class references from "fa" and "fa=" to "pwm-icon" and "pwm-". This should make the HTML more generic, in case themes want to redefine the icon styles.

@jrivard Please review and merge

Changed all references from "fa" and "fa=*" to "pwm-icon" and "pwm-*".
@jrivard
Copy link
Contributor

jrivard commented Dec 1, 2015

Looks good with one exception...

I was able to override an icon in a theme by setting a background-image and clearing the content attribute.

However, the icon classes are now difficult to search since the prefix is pwm-* making a global search and replace impossible, unlike how it was with fa-. Can you update to have the icon prefix be pwm-icon- instead of pwm-* ?

@jalbr74
Copy link
Contributor Author

jalbr74 commented Dec 1, 2015

Sure, I'll make the changes and update the pull request.

Changed from "pwm-*" to "pwm-icon-*" to make it easier to search for css classes related to icons.
@jalbr74
Copy link
Contributor Author

jalbr74 commented Dec 1, 2015

OK, the prefixes have all been changed from "pwm-" to "pwm-icon-".

@jrivard Please review and merge

jrivard added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2015
@jrivard jrivard merged commit 0a4c9b1 into master Dec 1, 2015
@jrivard jrivard deleted the fontawesome-changes branch December 1, 2015 22:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants