Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test: Upgrade pulumi/{pkg,sdk} to 202491bfea6af05adc505d41a5166e7db9bbdee3 #420

Conversation

pulumi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was generated via $ upgrade-provider pulumi/pulumi-aiven --kind=bridge --target-bridge-version=latest --pr-reviewers=t0yv0 --target-pulumi-version=202491bfea6af05adc505d41a5166e7db9bbdee3.


t0yv0 is testing this PR again

@pulumi-bot pulumi-bot self-assigned this Oct 27, 2023
@pulumi-bot pulumi-bot requested a review from t0yv0 October 27, 2023 19:21
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ require (
github.com/pkg/term v1.1.0 // indirect
github.com/pmezard/go-difflib v1.0.0 // indirect
github.com/pulumi/esc v0.5.6 // indirect
github.com/pulumi/pulumi/sdk/v3 v3.90.1 // indirect
github.com/pulumi/pulumi/sdk/v3 v3.91.0 // indirect
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder it made this change but I guess replace takes care of it anyway. Perhaps tidy is not good after a replace? Not sure; we do want to chase down minor indirect dependencies automatically though. This is probably as good as it gets. CC @iwahbe

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we don't tidy then go complains that it can't parse the go.mod file, since most of go's resolvers don't handle SHAs as versions correctly.

I think this is good enough.

@@ -86,3 +86,7 @@ require (
lukechampine.com/frand v1.4.2 // indirect
sourcegraph.com/sourcegraph/appdash v0.0.0-20211028080628-e2786a622600 // indirect
)

replace github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/v3 => github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/v3 v3.78.2-0.20231027181420-202491bfea6a
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoughtful.

@t0yv0
Copy link
Member

t0yv0 commented Oct 27, 2023

This is looking good. I think we're good to go.

@github-actions
Copy link

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

Maintainer note: consult the runbook for dealing with any breaking changes.

@t0yv0 t0yv0 closed this Oct 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants