Updated dockerfile for arm64.

[Taztingo]

Description

Added support for arm64 in provenance-io/blockchain docker image.

closes: #1260

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

• Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
• Wrote unit and integration tests
• Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
• Added relevant godoc comments.
• Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
• Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

[arnabmitra]

@Taztingo is there a way to re us/combine to this https://github.com/provenance-io/provenance/blob/9c4dd0f1c3169d198606b73747588b41f02836c2/networks/local/blockchain-local/Dockerfile#L89-L88 ..i do think your PR is nice

[arnabmitra]

lgtm ..would def be helpful to build this directly on a M1, rather than rely on a build machine

[Taztingo]

@arnabmitra The two sections in that other Dockerfile can definitely be combined to be similar to this. It was originally separated because libwasmvm_aarch64.so didn't exist and we had to manually build it.

You are correct that there isn't too much of a difference between this Dockerfile and the other one mentioned. It looks like this one is mainly used to quickly query/transact an already existing blockchain. The other one interacts with entrypoint.sh and starts a blockchain. Maybe we can make reuse the one you pointed out and add configurable params.

[arnabmitra]

@arnabmitra The two sections in that other Dockerfile can definitely be combined to be similar to this. It was originally separated because libwasmvm_aarch64.so didn't exist and we had to manually build it.

You are correct that there isn't too much of a difference between this Dockerfile and the other one mentioned. It looks like this one is mainly used to quickly query/transact an already existing blockchain. The other one interacts with entrypoint.sh and starts a blockchain. Maybe we can make reuse the one you pointed out and add configurable params.

probably not worth holding up this PR though..this looks like a good fix to have