Add jsr305 to protobuf-util deps. #9059
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This prepares for a change (internal CL 399474184, to be mirrored out to GitHub) to add a few such annotations in FieldMaskUtil and JsonFormat. (Technically, this PR is probably not "necessary" because protobuf-util already depends transitively on jsr305. But it's better hygiene to depend on it directly, and the direct dependency could protect against problems if protobuf-util drops some of its other deps -- or if those deps drop their own deps on jsr305.)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This prepares for a change (internal CL 399474184, to be mirrored out to GitHub) to add a few such annotations in FieldMaskUtil and JsonFormat.
(Technically, this PR is probably not "necessary" because protobuf-util already depends transitively on jsr305. But it's better hygiene to depend on it directly, and the direct dependency could protect against problems if protobuf-util drops some of its other deps -- or if those deps drop their own deps on jsr305.)
release notes: no