Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Timestamps fromDate for negative 'exact second' java.sql.Timestamps #10321

Conversation

q-nathangrand
Copy link
Contributor

(-1000/1000) -1 = -2s // This is what the code used to incorrectly do
(-999/1000) - 1 = -1s // This is correct

Copy link
Member

@deannagarcia deannagarcia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix and the added test!!

@deannagarcia deannagarcia merged commit 076f421 into protocolbuffers:main Aug 8, 2022
srowen pushed a commit to apache/spark that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2023
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr aims upgrade `protobuf-java` from 3.21.12 to 3.22.0

### Why are the changes needed?
The new version bring some improvements like:

- Use bit-field int values in buildPartial to skip work on unset groups of fields. (protocolbuffers/protobuf@2326aef)
- Fix serialization warnings in generated code when compiling with Java 18 and above (protocolbuffers/protobuf#10561)
- Enable Text format parser to skip unknown short-formed repeated fields. (protocolbuffers/protobuf@6dbd413)
- Add serialVersionUID to ByteString and subclasses (protocolbuffers/protobuf#10718)

and some bug fix like:
- Mark default instance as immutable first to avoid race during static initialization of default instances. (protocolbuffers/protobuf#10770)

- Fix Timestamps fromDate for negative 'exact second' java.sql.Timestamps (protocolbuffers/protobuf#10321)
- Fix Timestamps.fromDate to correctly handle java.sql.Timestamps before unix epoch (protocolbuffers/protobuf#10126)
- Fix bug in nested builder caching logic where cleared sub-field builders would remain dirty after a clear and build in a parent layer. protocolbuffers/protobuf#10624

The release notes as follows:

- https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases/tag/v22.0

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Pass GitHub Actions

Closes #40084 from LuciferYang/SPARK-42490.

Authored-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants