-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor Inquire so it can resolve modules in Browsers with default CPS #1548
Open
seanlangbrown
wants to merge
2
commits into
protobufjs:master
Choose a base branch
from
seanlangbrown:seanLB.removeEvalFromInquire
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "@protobufjs/inquire", | ||
"description": "Requires a module only if available and hides the require call from bundlers.", | ||
"description": "Requires a module only if available.", | ||
"version": "1.1.0", | ||
"author": "Daniel Wirtz <[email protected]>", | ||
"repository": { | ||
|
@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ | |
"test": "tape tests/*.js", | ||
"coverage": "istanbul cover node_modules/tape/bin/tape tests/*.js" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"externals": [ | ||
"long", | ||
"buffer" | ||
] | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The original idea here was to have a way to
require
only ifrequire
is present (on node), in turn making it necessary that bundlers do not recognize this, yet still having protobuf.js as a dependency somewhere in a graph doesn't blow up. With this change, the common case seems to become that stuff blows up, unless every dependent goes through the hassle of changing their configs.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dcodeIO Yes, as you say, I have kept the original intended behavior by setting the
externals
in the package.json, which creates a trade-off between using eval() and having to set configs. If that's not acceptable (I understand - it adds maintenance effort), could we create a distribution of ProtobufJS intended for the browsers that does not use eval at all, calledProtobufjs/minimal-browser
? It seems if you are okay withinquire
not working in most browsers, then there's no reason to include it.This should be easy to configure with gulp: we can replace inquire with a dummy function that always returns null. As I see it, there's no point to calling eval() if it is blocked by the browser, and the message that the browsers print make people think that there is a problem. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dcodeIO Following up on this one more time - I think no config changes are needed by dependent projects. The changes to
package.json
in this repo prevent dependents from blowing up.I'm sorry I did not clearly address your concern in my last comment. If I can demonstrate that no dependent config changes are needed, would you reconsider this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am mostly out of the loop and it's hard for me to see all the implications. Mostly putting a comment here or there for other reviewers :)