Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mark webhook URL as a secret #3228

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2023
Merged

Conversation

sr
Copy link
Contributor

@sr sr commented Jan 25, 2023

As discussed in #3223

/cc @gotjosh @simonpasquier

Signed-off-by: Simon Rozet <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@gotjosh gotjosh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gotjosh
Copy link
Member

gotjosh commented Jan 26, 2023

Any thoughts @simonpasquier?

@simonpasquier
Copy link
Member

I don't feel strongly about it but we need to make it explicit in the CHANGELOG that the webhook's URL is now a secret value and that it won't show up in the Alertmanager's logs in clear.

@sr
Copy link
Contributor Author

sr commented Jan 26, 2023

Should I update the changelog or will you take care of it?

Also I still think #3223 is useful, for deployments where secrets are injected as files (e.g. secret volume in Kubernetes or systemd-creds)

I will rebase that PR and add some more tests after this is merged.

@simonpasquier
Copy link
Member

Should I update the changelog or will you take care of it?

No, whoever is going to shepherd/review the next release should be vigilant. And yes #3223 is useful.

@gotjosh gotjosh merged commit 8f559aa into prometheus:main Feb 2, 2023
@gotjosh
Copy link
Member

gotjosh commented Feb 2, 2023

No, whoever is going to shepherd/review the next release should be vigilant.

I'll keep it in mind.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants