Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add sig-multitenancy-bench conformance #309

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 11, 2021
Merged

Add sig-multitenancy-bench conformance #309

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 11, 2021

Conversation

bsctl
Copy link
Member

@bsctl bsctl commented Jun 28, 2021

Close #68

Copy link
Member

@prometherion prometherion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be great having some examples attached to each benchmark: WDYT?

We can track it in a separate issue.

@bsctl bsctl added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 3, 2021
@nmarcetic
Copy link

@bsctl It would be great if you can link each item in the list, as they did it , there are a few more for Level 2.
Each item is self-documented with references on how to accomplish it.

@bsctl bsctl changed the title doc: add sig-multitenancy-bench conformance Add sig-multitenancy-bench conformance Jul 17, 2021
@bsctl bsctl marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2021 12:16
@bsctl bsctl requested review from alegrey91 and ptx96 July 17, 2021 12:16
@bsctl
Copy link
Member Author

bsctl commented Jul 17, 2021

@ptx96 @alegrey91, it would be useful to run the test cases on your own setup.

Copy link
Member

@prometherion prometherion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Astonishing work, @bsctl!

@prometherion
Copy link
Member

@bsctl are we ready to get this merged? If it is, I'm going to squash all the commits.

@bsctl
Copy link
Member Author

bsctl commented Jul 29, 2021

@prometherion waiting a review from @ptx96 and @alegrey91

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Meet the multi-tenancy benchmarks requirements
5 participants