Restore route reflector tests #1419
Conversation
|
This should pass CI once projectcalico/confd#71 and projectcalico/routereflector#3 have merged. |
|
@neiljerram You can rebase off the latest master to resolve the htmlproofer errors. |
|
Thanks @robbrockbank and @caseydavenport . I'm wondering though, if I need to add something to _data/versions.yml to reference a particular version of calico/routereflector - which I guess also means that it becomes a release artefact - and machinery in the routereflector repo to push tagged images to dockerhub and quay. Currently that machinery is missing and the ST process here just pulls calico/routereflector:latest. (How is that working....?) |
|
So specifically, I'd now propose:
WDYT? |
nelljerram
force-pushed
the
restore-route-reflector-tests
branch
from
ed35da3 to
c5fc46b
Compare
|
(Just rebased.) Also I previously just released calico/routereflector v0.5.0, so would expect the CI now to pass on this PR... |
nelljerram
force-pushed
the
restore-route-reflector-tests
branch
from
f1b2feb to
ad296ac
Compare
(But not yet tests that involve a cluster of route reflectors.)
This was accidentally changed from 64514 to 12345, while this test was disabled, by commit 03fec6d.
nelljerram
force-pushed
the
restore-route-reflector-tests
branch
from
ad296ac to
73583ac
Compare
This is similar to projectcalico#1429 but for TestBase.assert_ip_connectivity (connectivity to IP addresses) instead of TestBase.assert_connectivity (connectivity to workloads). (I saw a case of TestBase.assert_ip_connectivity failing, in test_autodetection.py, while testing for projectcalico#1419.)
No description provided.