Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Persist and reload message counters on the controller #7106
Persist and reload message counters on the controller #7106
Changes from 7 commits
92ab9f0
c9c017d
71468cc
b30b7ce
95c2c65
f49beb2
d730cc6
cff7979
8d809b9
96b7350
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we remove this comment? I do not see a base-64 serialization here. I realize it used to be in moved code ... guessing base64 was removed but comment was left. We can clean it up now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we are still base-64 encoding it twice right? Once because the device supports serializing to a
SerializedDevice
and then again because the Darwin storage delegate converts everything to base-64There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it was non-obvious to me because 'inner' is not type-defined.
if it would be inner.base64 that would be understandable. However now it is inner and sizeof(inner) so everything sure looks binary to me.
Consider moving inside the serialize.inner reading/writing since this is were we say "this is binary, no need for base64".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should these comments be part of the struct? I believe that this should be part of the serialize/deserialize methods like "serializes 16-bit and larger values as little endian".