Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restyle Convert persistent storage to sync calls and binary data to align with KVS style storage #6294

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

restyled-io[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@restyled-io restyled-io bot commented Apr 26, 2021

A duplicate of #6286 with additional commits that automatically address
incorrect style, created by Restyled.

⚠️ Even though this PR is not a Fork, it contains outside contributions.
Please review accordingly.

Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it with only
the style fixes.

The following Restylers made fixes:

To incorporate these changes, you can either:

  1. Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or

  2. Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
    the original Pull Request

    Expand for example instructions
    ```console
    git remote add upstream https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip.git
    git fetch upstream pull/<this PR number>/head
    git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
    git push
    ```
    

NOTE: As work continues on the original Pull Request, this process will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with updated style fixes as
necessary. If the style is fixed manually at any point (i.e. this process finds
no fixes to make), this Pull Request will be closed automatically.

Sorry if this was unexpected. To disable it, see our documentation.

@restyled-io restyled-io bot added the restyled label Apr 26, 2021
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the app label Apr 26, 2021
@todo
Copy link

todo bot commented Apr 26, 2021

no need to base-64 the serialized values AGAIN

// TODO: no need to base-64 the serialized values AGAIN
PERSISTENT_KEY_OP(device->GetDeviceId(), kPairedDeviceKeyPrefix, key,
mStorageDelegate->SyncSetKeyValue(key, serialized.inner, sizeof(serialized.inner)));
}
}


This comment was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 6121842 in #6294. cc @project-chip.

@todo
Copy link

todo bot commented Apr 26, 2021

no need to base64 again the value

// TODO: no need to base64 again the value
PERSISTENT_KEY_OP(static_cast<uint64_t>(0), kPairedDeviceListKeyPrefix, key,
mStorageDelegate->SyncSetKeyValue(key, value, static_cast<uint16_t>(strlen(value))));
mPairedDevicesUpdated = false;
}
chip::Platform::MemoryFree(serialized);
}
mStorageDelegate->SyncSetKeyValue(kNextAvailableKeyID, &mNextKeyId, sizeof(mNextKeyId));
}
}


This comment was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 6121842 in #6294. cc @project-chip.

@todo
Copy link

todo bot commented Apr 26, 2021

ideally the error from the dispatch should be returned

// TODO: ideally the error from the dispatch should be returned
// however we expect to replace the storage delegate with KVS so for now
// we return no error (return used to be void due to async dispatch anyway)
return CHIP_NO_ERROR;
}
CHIP_ERROR CHIPPersistentStorageDelegateBridge::SyncDeleteKeyValue(const char * key)
{
NSString * keyString = [NSString stringWithUTF8String:key];
dispatch_async(mWorkQueue, ^{


This comment was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 6121842 in #6294. cc @project-chip.

@todo
Copy link

todo bot commented Apr 26, 2021

ideally the error from the dispatch should be returned

// TODO: ideally the error from the dispatch should be returned
// however we expect to replace the storage delegate with KVS so for now
// we return no error (return used to be void due to async dispatch anyway)
return CHIP_NO_ERROR;
}


This comment was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 6121842 in #6294. cc @project-chip.

@restyled-io restyled-io bot closed this Apr 26, 2021
@restyled-io restyled-io bot deleted the restyled/pull-6286 branch April 26, 2021 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants