-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Python: Delete key wasn't actually persisting #20486
Merged
woody-apple
merged 1 commit into
project-chip:master
from
mrjerryjohns:python/storage-del-key
Jul 8, 2022
Merged
Python: Delete key wasn't actually persisting #20486
woody-apple
merged 1 commit into
project-chip:master
from
mrjerryjohns:python/storage-del-key
Jul 8, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The Python implementation of the PersistentStorageDelegate::SyncDeleteKey API was not actually syncing the deleted key back to the underlying JSON file, resulting in the deletion not actually 'sticking' despite passing the storage audit.
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
andy31415,
anush-apple,
arkq,
Byungjoo-Lee,
bzbarsky-apple,
carol-apple,
chrisdecenzo,
chshu,
chulspro,
Damian-Nordic,
dhrishi,
electrocucaracha,
emargolis,
erjiaqing,
franck-apple,
gjc13,
harsha-rajendran,
hawk248,
isiu-apple,
jelderton,
jepenven-silabs,
jmartinez-silabs,
jtung-apple,
kghost,
kpschoedel,
lazarkov,
LuDuda and
mlepage-google
July 8, 2022 14:16
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
jmartinez-silabs,
jtung-apple,
kghost,
kpschoedel,
lazarkov,
LuDuda,
mlepage-google,
msandstedt,
mspang,
rgoliver,
saurabhst,
selissia,
tecimovic,
vijs,
vivien-apple,
wbschiller,
woody-apple,
xylophone21,
yufengwangca and
yunhanw-google
July 8, 2022 14:16
PR #20486: Size comparison from 8ebd7f0 to 01788cd Increases (3 builds for cc13x2_26x2, nrfconnect)
Decreases (2 builds for cc13x2_26x2, telink)
Full report (30 builds for cc13x2_26x2, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, telink)
|
Damian-Nordic
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2022
woody-apple
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2022
Fast tracking tooling |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Python implementation of the
PersistentStorageDelegate::SyncDeleteKey
API was not actually syncing the deleted key back to the underlying JSON file, resulting in the deletion not actually 'sticking' despite passing the storage audit.Testing
As part of bringing up server-side feature logic on the REPL, noticed that we were getting odd messages about an aborted fabric despite successfully completing commissioning and the audit.
After doing the above, the issue went away.