-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure buff size constraints in chip logging module name fetch #14844
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
anush-apple,
austinh0,
balducci-apple,
Byungjoo-Lee,
bzbarsky-apple,
carol-apple,
cecille,
chrisdecenzo,
chshu,
chulspro,
Damian-Nordic,
dhrishi,
electrocucaracha,
franck-apple,
gjc13,
harimau-qirex,
hawk248,
holbrookt,
harsha-rajendran,
isiu-apple,
jelderton,
jepenven-silabs,
jmartinez-silabs,
kpschoedel,
LuDuda,
msandstedt,
mspang and
robszewczyk
February 7, 2022 15:56
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
sagar-apple,
saurabhst,
selissia,
tecimovic,
turon,
vijs,
vivien-apple,
wbschiller,
woody-apple,
xylophone21,
yufengwangca and
yunhanw-google
February 7, 2022 15:56
PR #14844: Size comparison from d5d9dc7 to d66215b Increases (20 builds for cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, p6, qpg, telink)
Full report (24 builds for cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, p6, qpg, telink)
|
bzbarsky-apple
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
msandstedt
reviewed
Feb 7, 2022
msandstedt
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2022
PR #14844: Size comparison from d5d9dc7 to b16c62d Increases above 0.2%:
Increases (10 builds for cyw30739, k32w, linux, qpg, telink)
Decreases (1 build for qpg)
Full report (11 builds for cyw30739, k32w, linux, qpg, telink)
|
bzbarsky-apple
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2022
size increases are not reasonable. Trying to re-trigger with master merge. |
PR #14844: Size comparison from 6f9fa8e to 9734954 Decreases (29 builds for cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
Full report (34 builds for cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Potential buffer overflow in CHIPLogging.cpp
Change overview
Fixes it.
Fixes #4730
Testing
Compiled and ran chip-tool, saw logs looking good.