-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add IsSelectResultValid to LayerImplSelect #13776
Merged
andy31415
merged 2 commits into
project-chip:master
from
alexhqwang:layerimpl-select-poll
Jan 21, 2022
Merged
Add IsSelectResultValid to LayerImplSelect #13776
andy31415
merged 2 commits into
project-chip:master
from
alexhqwang:layerimpl-select-poll
Jan 21, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
andy31415,
anush-apple,
balducci-apple,
Byungjoo-Lee,
bzbarsky-apple,
carol-apple,
cecille,
chrisdecenzo,
chshu,
chulspro,
Damian-Nordic,
dhrishi,
electrocucaracha,
emargolis,
erjiaqing,
franck-apple,
gjc13,
harimau-qirex,
hawk248,
jelderton,
jepenven-silabs,
jmartinez-silabs,
kghost,
kpschoedel,
LuDuda,
lzgrablic02,
msandstedt and
pan-apple
January 20, 2022 18:21
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
sagar-apple,
saurabhst,
selissia,
tecimovic,
vijs,
vivien-apple,
wbschiller,
woody-apple,
xylophone21,
yufengwangca and
yunhanw-google
January 20, 2022 18:21
kpschoedel
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2022
PR #13776: Size comparison from fa0b36f to 3cdd00a Increases (2 builds for linux)
Full report (30 builds for efr32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
|
saurabhst
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2022
PR #13776: Size comparison from c24c34b to 8d6632c Increases (2 builds for linux)
Full report (32 builds for efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
|
msandstedt
approved these changes
Jan 21, 2022
andy31415
approved these changes
Jan 21, 2022
fast track: small delta, a lot of checkmarks |
selissia
pushed a commit
to selissia/connectedhomeip
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
What is being fixed?
A POSIX build target that does not run the typical event loop may require more flexibility from the LayerImplSelect API.
For example, consider a Linux simulator for a non-Linux device. The device implementation of PlatformManager would not be capable of blocking on
select
. However, the simulator would need to process SystemLayer socket events. Naturally one reaches for the public LayerSocketLoop API to "peek" on the sockets and process the events ad hoc, but to do so it needs a way to check if WaitForEvents was successful.Change overview
Provide a method to check if
select
failed before calling HandleEvents when polling sockets.Testing
How was this tested? (at least one bullet point required)