-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduce a way to loop over endpoints that have a given server cluster. #12542
Merged
bzbarsky-apple
merged 1 commit into
project-chip:master
from
bzbarsky-apple:better-endpoint-looping
Dec 3, 2021
Merged
Introduce a way to loop over endpoints that have a given server cluster. #12542
bzbarsky-apple
merged 1 commit into
project-chip:master
from
bzbarsky-apple:better-endpoint-looping
Dec 3, 2021
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We have several places that are doing this, all of them in not-so-great ways (e.g. mapping indices to endpoint ids and then back to indices, which is O(N^2) in number of endpoints). Better to have a utility that does it right.
Log SoftwareFault event and walk them all.connectedhomeip/src/app/clusters/software_diagnostics_server/software_diagnostics_server.cpp Lines 135 to 140 in 12b3906
This comment was generated by todo based on a
|
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
andy31415,
anush-apple,
austinh0,
balducci-apple,
carol-apple,
chrisdecenzo,
chulspro,
Damian-Nordic,
electrocucaracha,
franck-apple,
hawk248,
jelderton,
jepenven-silabs,
jmartinez-silabs,
kghost,
LuDuda,
mlepage-google,
mrjerryjohns,
msandstedt,
mspang,
pan-apple,
sagar-apple,
saurabhst,
selissia,
tcarmelveilleux and
tecimovic
December 3, 2021 06:18
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
kghost,
LuDuda,
mlepage-google,
mrjerryjohns,
msandstedt,
mspang,
pan-apple,
sagar-apple,
saurabhst,
selissia,
tcarmelveilleux,
tecimovic,
turon,
vijs,
vivien-apple,
wbschiller,
woody-apple,
yufengwangca and
yunhanw-google
December 3, 2021 06:18
PR #12542: Size comparison from f111727 to 12b3906 Increases (4 builds for linux)
Decreases (25 builds for efr32, esp32, k32w, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
Full report (39 builds for efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
|
Damian-Nordic
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2021
woody-apple
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2021
LuDuda
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2021
yunhanw-google
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have several places that are doing this, all of them in
not-so-great ways (e.g. mapping indices to endpoint ids and then back
to indices, which is O(N^2) in number of endpoints). Better to have a
utility that does it right.
Problem
See above.
Change overview
See above.
Testing
No behavior changes, except smaller, faster code.