Create a union type for types defined as array #141
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Nevermind, seems that GraphQL doesn't support union on scalar types. Maybe you can give me an idea how to solve this |
|
Hi @pristas-peter We have confirmed that this fix works for us. Related to this issue: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@pristas-peter for the
templateLockattribute the type is declared as an array instead of a string. This code creates a union and avoids the warning.Closes #127
Let me know if it makes sense to you. I tried to follow the code standard of the file although it does not match WordPress-Core. Thanks