Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updating britepool docs #2574

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bansawbanchee
Copy link
Contributor

Updating BritePool user id module description

@@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ of sub-objects. The table below has the options that are common across ID system

### BritePool

BritePool ID, provided by [BritePool](https://britepool.com) is a Universal Identity resolution which does not depend on 3rd party cookies.
The [BritePool]((https://britepool.com)) ID is a persistent identifier that enables identity resolution for people-based marketing in the cookieless world. Every BritePool ID is associated with a real identity. As a result, publishers, SSP's and DSP's that integrate with BritePool, or automated
integration partners (such as PubMatic), are able to maximize revenues without cookies. As addressable individuals visit publisher websites and mobile apps, the BritePool IDs associated with these identities are passed into the bidstream; enabling advertisers to transact against these BritePool ID's and publishers to maximize the revenues associated with their inventory and audience. Unlike other universal identity solutions, the BritePool ID combines consumer privacy with easy, rapid integration for publishers and does not significantly increase the computing resources required of DSPs and SSPs.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please drop the sales pitch language here: "Unlike other universal identity solutions" -- Prebid cannot verify that other solutions don't also offer these features.

@bretg
Copy link
Contributor

bretg commented Feb 17, 2021

@bansawbanchee - ping.

@MartianTribe
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, we cannot merge your docs into our doc set as there are changes pending. Could you either make the changes or cancel this PR, it is over 3 months old. Thanks.

@bretg
Copy link
Contributor

bretg commented Mar 3, 2021

I just fixed this myself by dropping the objectionable clause in a separate PR #2735 . Closing this one.

@bretg bretg closed this Mar 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants