Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

module rule documentation updates #5619

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2020
Merged

module rule documentation updates #5619

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2020

Conversation

bretg
Copy link
Collaborator

@bretg bretg commented Aug 17, 2020

Type of change

  • Other

Description of change

Documentation update for module rules.

Please don't merge this until prebid/prebid.github.io#2242 is merged.

@bretg bretg requested a review from jsnellbaker August 17, 2020 21:08
@bretg bretg changed the title module rule updates module rule documentation updates Aug 17, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@jsnellbaker jsnellbaker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @bretg

Thanks for putting this together. I think it largely looks good. I did have one question about one of the links. Please take a look when you have a minute.

Thanks.

- Adapters may not use the $$PREBID_GLOBAL$$ variable
- All adapters must support the creation of multiple concurrent instances. This means, for example, that adapters cannot rely on mutable global variables.
- Adapters may not globally override or default the standard ad server targeting values: hb_adid, hb_bidder, hb_pb, hb_deal, or hb_size, hb_source, hb_format.
- All required global and bidder-adapter rules defined in the [Module Rules](https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/module-rules.html) must be followed. Please review these rules often - we depend on reviewers to enforce them.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current link goes to a 404. Just to confirm - will this page exist in the near future?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right - was waiting on the docs PR merge until that was reviewed and we discussed in the PBJS committee yesterday the proposal that all of the aspirational rules are aimed for 5.0. Anyhow, just merged the docs PR and that URL is now available.

@bretg bretg requested a review from jsnellbaker August 20, 2020 18:32
@bretg bretg merged commit 32066aa into master Aug 22, 2020
@bretg bretg deleted the module-rules branch August 22, 2020 15:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants