Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible bug in 1.0 with hb_deal being replaced with hb_deal_bidder #3059

Closed
snapwich opened this issue Sep 6, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3062
Closed

Possible bug in 1.0 with hb_deal being replaced with hb_deal_bidder #3059

snapwich opened this issue Sep 6, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3062
Assignees

Comments

@snapwich
Copy link
Collaborator

snapwich commented Sep 6, 2018

Type of issue

possible bug

Description

In the 1.0 update there were changes to targeting reflecting issues with hb_deal in #1574. In this comment the idea of adding hb_deal_{bidder_code} to the the standard keys was discussed and then implemented here. However, the code update replaces hb_deal with hb_deal_{bidder_code} meaning that hb_deal is never sent, only hb_deal_{bidder_code}.

I'm not positive that this change was intentional. If it was, it should be reflected in the 1.0 Publisher API changes documented here. If it was not, then it's a bug that needs to be fixed.

Steps to reproduce

Return a dealId as a bidder in 1.0. hb_deal_{bidder_code} will be sent as targeting data but hb_deal will not.

ZLester added a commit to ZLester/Prebid.js that referenced this issue Sep 9, 2018
ZLester added a commit to ZLester/Prebid.js that referenced this issue Sep 9, 2018
harpere pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 11, 2018
* Fix #3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
ptomasroos pushed a commit to happypancake/Prebid.js that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2018
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
StefanWallin pushed a commit to mittmedia/Prebid.js that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2018
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
SublimeJeremy pushed a commit to SublimeSkinz/Prebid.js that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2018
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
ghost pushed a commit to devunrulymedia/Prebid.js that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2019
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
pedrolopezmrf pushed a commit to Marfeel/Prebid.js that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2019
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
AlessandroDG pushed a commit to simplaex/Prebid.js that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2019
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
AlessandroDG pushed a commit to simplaex/Prebid.js that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2019
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants