Handle DRF 3.9+ breaking change #7
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 19 commits
May 10, 2021 15:32
ruands
approved these changes
May 12, 2021
| @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ def test_anonymous_get_user(self): | |||
| self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 403) | |||
|
|
|||
| def test_superuser_create_user(self): | |||
| self.client.login(username="superuser", password="password") | |||
| self.client.force_authenticate(self.superuser) | |||
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DRF decided to change the
base_nameargument tobasenamearound v3.9, which means the call torouter.registerwas throwing a TypeError on projects using higher DRF versions.This should have been a small update, but the unit tests became a nightmare and had to be overhauled.
force_authenticateinstead ofclient.loginin the view and user tests