Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

BLR UI interface (new) #237

Open
myrmoteras opened this issue Nov 29, 2023 · 13 comments
Open

BLR UI interface (new) #237

myrmoteras opened this issue Nov 29, 2023 · 13 comments
Assignees
@lnielsen @myrmoteras
Labels
BLR ui

Comments

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor

Dear Donat, Terry, Felipe,

@flsimoes @tcatapano @teodorgeorgiev @lyubomirpenev @plazi/poa-office

Jenny is working on improving the record pages for BLR. Could you please review the mockups below and let me know any feedback you have.

The mockups show journal article record page. The page has a new section “Related works" which displays related figures and taxonomic treatments from the BLR community. Related is defined as all records with a “Is part of” relation linking back to the journal article.

Additionally:

  1. You can toggle between a) list view and 2) thumbnail view - which should be the default?
  2. You can filter by resource type using the drop-down
  3. You can search through the record

Some things you cannot do:

  1. Change the sort order
  2. Change the number of results shown (e.g. 10, 20, 50, 100)

Best regards,
Lars
@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dear all,

Any feedback? Jenny will start implement this now and only have the next two weeks to finish it up (she’s ending her contract Dec 22).

Cheers,
Lars

@flsimoes
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Lars

Sorry for not replying sooner.
I'll check with the team and get back to you later today or early tomorrow with our suggestions.

All the best
Felipe

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi Lars

The viewing options and how they are presented seem all fine.
The two questions we have though are about the naming of the "Related Works" section itself.

  1. I understand why the section is named "Related Works", but it can be misinterpreted as "other articles" or "other publications". Not really sure what it could be called though... Maybe "Related Content"?
  2. It occurs twice in the page, which can be quite confusing. I suggest adding something at the end of the bottom one, such as "Related Works list", "Related Works links" or something like that.

All the best
Felipe

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi Lars and Jenny

Her some more comments

Article

https://zenodo.org/records/10244718

Add under "has part"

  • ALSO the Doi or link to the treatment in BLR/Zenodo
  • If possible the name of the taxon, which is given in the treatment as "sec:

In the references section, might it be possible to hyperlink the Doi, if available?

Thanks for looking into this
Donat

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi Jenny and Lars
One more issue. In the previous version of Zenodo, there has been a link from the journal article page to GBIF. In this case, there would be a link from https://zenodo.org/records/10244652 to https://www.gbif.org/dataset/ac0e6a04-e3b0-4e9d-b584-33176aab08b3.

There could, and in fact should be a link (is source of” from a treatment to the GBIF treatment, eg from http://zenodo.org/record/10250370 to http://www.gbif.org/species/219495280

If the GBIF specie ID is not provided, we might want to ask Guido to do so?

Thanks for looking into this too

Donat

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi,

Thanks for the feedback.

####### Landing page mockups

From what I get there’s the following things:

  1. "Related works” is not a good name What one of these:
  • Linked records
  • Related records
  • Record parts
  • Related community records
  • Relationships
  • Record relations
  • Associated work
  • Parts
  • Subparts
  • Record package
  1. “References” section - if there’s a link we should make it clickable. @jenny (you should be able to "| urlize” Jinja template filter for this.

####### External resources
Yes, there should be links to GBIF, TB and SIBLS under the External Resources like this image (ignore the wrong logo’s / alignment)

Image

TreatmentBank

GBIF

  • if related identifiers has link to www.gbif.org with relation is source of

SIBLS

Cheers,
Lars

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dear colleagues @lyubomirpenev @teodorgeorgiev Laurence, @tcatapano

I know, this is on a very short note, and I am sorry that I only thought about this today, but please have a look today at the new UI of BLR. But I think it is nevertheless better to get you involved as well.

BLR moved to a new version of InvenioRDM which allows more flexibility and with that also regarding the access to data and how the deposits and its metadata is displayed. It also offers new ways to administer access – which I will explain later.

For today, please look at the UI and let us know, whether you see something that needs attention, change immediately. There is always a chance to for implementing changes later. You can also ask other member of the team.

Right now, these are the pages

  1. Entire article https://zenodo.org/records/8402224
  2. Figure https://zenodo.org/records/8402234
  3. Taxonomic Treatment https://zenodo.org/records/8407968
  4. Physical specimen https://zenodo.org/records/6083947
  5. Photo https://zenodo.org/records/6084035

Thanks for taking a moment

Donat

@lyubomirpenev
Copy link

lyubomirpenev commented Dec 7, 2023 via email

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor Author

myrmoteras commented Dec 7, 2023 via email

@lyubomirpenev
Copy link

lyubomirpenev commented Dec 7, 2023 via email

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor Author

myrmoteras commented Dec 7, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@lnielsen

Adding additional **is source of **

Guido will import at least an additional URL for a source in GBIF in treatment an additional link to the article
image

Add taxonomic names to treatment links in the article metadata and figure metadata,

e,g, Kamabrachys signata (Distant, 1892) sec. Constant, 2023

image.
The source of the name could be:

"openbiodiv:TaxonomicConceptLabel": [
"Kamabrachys signata (Distant, 1892) sec. Constant, 2023"
or
"title": "Kamabrachys signata Constant 2023, gen. et comb. nov."

source: https://zenodo.org/records/8407988

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor Author

myrmoteras commented Dec 8, 2023 •
edited
Loading

image

can this be changed into

ant, J. (2023). Fig. 5. Kamabrachys spp., distribution maps. A. K, in Revision of the Eurybrachidae (XVII). The new Australian genus Kamabrachys gen. nov. with ten new species (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha). European Journal of Taxonomy, Vol. 895 (1), p. 1 133). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8402234

make sure, where the citation of the article begins.

and remove zenodo in front of the https://doi...

https://zenodo.org/records/8402234

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor Author

Add Figure number provided in the caption to the figure, which would make it much easier to find the respective figure-
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lnielsen lnielsen

@myrmoteras myrmoteras

Labels
BLR ui
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@lnielsen @flsimoes @lyubomirpenev @myrmoteras