-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sink-to-mysql(cdc) simplify conflict detector, prevent workload skew issue #10376
Conversation
…issue Signed-off-by: zhangjinpeng1987 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhangjinpeng1987 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhangjinpeng1987 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhangjinpeng1987 <[email protected]>
/test cdc-integration-storage-test |
/test dm-integration-test |
if resolved && assignedTo == assignedToAny { | ||
assignedTo = n.RandWorkerID() | ||
func (n *Node) maybeReadyToRun() { | ||
if ok := n.checkReadiness(); ok { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When a large number of small transactions are in conflict, does performance degrade significantly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is suppose not fast in the case of there are a large number of small transactions have conflict, no matter what you do.
/test dm-integration-test |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: asddongmen, hicqu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376)" This reverts commit 9e0cacf.
…oad skew issue (pingcap#10376)" This reverts commit b1a9473.
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376)" This reverts commit 9e0cacf.
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376)" This reverts commit 9e0cacf.
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376)" This reverts commit 9e0cacf.
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376) (pingcap#10780)" This reverts commit 2631409.
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376)" This reverts commit 9e0cacf.
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376) (pingcap#10779)" This reverts commit c43300c.
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376) (pingcap#10778)" This reverts commit 2c55c0e.
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376)" This reverts commit 9e0cacf.
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376)" This reverts commit 9e0cacf.
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376) (pingcap#10779)" This reverts commit c43300c.
…ad skew issue (pingcap#10376)" This reverts commit 9e0cacf.
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #10341
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Questions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
Release note